> > > > > > Out of curiosity, why do you start a new thread instead > > > > > > of replying to a post? I mean no offense - just > > > > > > curious. > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > I didn't--I replied to the existing thread. > > > > > > > > > > Joan <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Then I don't understand why your replies to me are not > > > > indented below previous replies. > > > > > > > > [email protected] (J. Hugh Sullivan) > > > > > > There's a mailing list mucking up the newsgroup threading. > > > When replies from the mailing list are made to the group, > > > they break the threads. > > > > > > Email and newsgroups do not play well together. > > > > > > Christopher Jahn <[email protected]> > > > > Thank you, > > > > [email protected] (J. Hugh Sullivan) > > This one's a perfect example: this post should have been highlighted > as a reply to my post, but all the headers have been stripped, > breaking the thread AND my news client's ability to recognize that > this is a reply to my post. > > Go get a newsreader, and see how much better life can be! > > Christopher Jahn <[email protected]> Interesting. My reply to you and your reply to me were in red until I read them. And each was indented under the header to which it responded. New threads are in red until read and/or deleted but not indented because they are new threads, not responses. I'm not sure how it could be clearer. I use Free Agent - I thought it was a newsreader. Hugh [email protected] (J. Hugh Sullivan)