In article <jCpj8.14450$Vx1.1191147@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> "Larry Y." <nospam@nospam.net> writes: >This is not an an attempt to start a discussion regarding the merits of >Mormon beliefs, but rather an effort to describe their doctrines. The >reader >can decide for himself/herself whether there is any merit to the Mormon >belief system or, for that matter, to the Catholic response as presented in >the article. I sort of doubt this, despite your posting the same intro twice. Both of the pieces you've posted are focused on detailing why the author (the Catholic Church according to you) says that the Mormons are wrong. You are welcome to that view, but don't pretend that it is a neutral presentation. -- Drew Lawson I had planned to be dead by now, but drew@furrfu.com the schedule slipped, they do that. -- Casady

> I sort of doubt this, despite your posting the same intro twice. > Both of the pieces you've posted are focused on detailing why the > author (the Catholic Church according to you) says that the Mormons > are wrong. You are welcome to that view, but don't pretend that > it is a neutral presentation. You are free to doubt my motives all you want, but you are still incorrect in your conclusions. I made it abundantly clear that the material was written by a lay Catholic organization, and was biased in favor of their viewpoint. What more could I have said by way of a disclaimer? Any discussion of the relative merits of various religions would be off-topic in a genealogy bulletin board. In the case of the LDS, they are so intertwined with the practice of genealogy that an exception is in order. I feared that someone would use those 2 posts to start a thread bashing Mormons. Please re-read my introductory paragraphs. > -- > Drew Lawson I had planned to be dead by now, but > drew@furrfu.com the schedule slipped, they do that. > -- Casady >