On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:18 GMT, "Rick J" <[email protected]> wrote: >Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods has loads of spam. >Soc'genealogy.methods which you bad mouth continualyy has none. > Close, but no seegar for Rick. Corrected statement follows. Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods is not even carried; of the few newservers carrying alt.genealogy.methods, many (most) have loads of spam. You're welcome.
"A Newsgroup Friend" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:18 GMT, "Rick J" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods has loads of spam. > >Soc'genealogy.methods which you bad mouth continualyy has none. > > > Close, but no seegar for Rick. Corrected statement follows. > > Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods is not even > carried; of the few newservers carrying alt.genealogy.methods, many > (most) have loads of spam. > > You're welcome. I stand corrected ! Thanks.