"A Newsgroup Friend" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:18 GMT, "Rick J" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods has loads of spam. > >Soc'genealogy.methods which you bad mouth continualyy has none. > > > Close, but no seegar for Rick. Corrected statement follows. > > Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods is not even > carried; of the few newservers carrying alt.genealogy.methods, many > (most) have loads of spam. > > You're welcome. Took you long enough to weigh in. Moron.

"Genjunkie" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > > "A Newsgroup Friend" <[email protected]> wrote in > message news:[email protected] > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:18 GMT, "Rick J" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods has loads of > spam. > > >Soc'genealogy.methods which you bad mouth continualyy has none. > > > > > Close, but no seegar for Rick. Corrected statement follows. > > > > Fact: On many (most) newservers alt.genealogy.methods is not even > > carried; of the few newservers carrying alt.genealogy.methods, many > > (most) have loads of spam. > > > > You're welcome. > > Took you long enough to weigh in. Moron. OK. Lets figure this out. This poster got it right and he is (according to you) a moron. You demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of News Servers. What does that make you ? > >