jrileysrie@yahoo.ie wrote: > I must respond to the note below...by someone who say > he is a 'Sir (bt)' meaning his ancestors served the > murderous, rapist, genocidical royal family of days > long gone by. Someone who by definition, using his > title assumes he is better by (blue) blood than others > with the red, human blood that passes through all our > veins. > > 'Sir,' how dare you assult the loyal Irish and even > attempt to say that traitors who serviced your king or > queen served loyally? Or, maybe the poor unfortunates > forced to service your king or queen were 'loyal' like > a woman being raped is loyal to her rapist? > > The tragedy of what happened in Ireland over hundreds > of years is now recognized by Amnesty International > and all freedom loving people around the world. Your > kind, and ilk and 'cult' around the royals is losing > ground, even in England, where people are finally > realizing that a foreign family came to rule England, > only to suck it dry of money, live a life of privelege > and incestually in-breed because they think themselves > superior in a conceited, and if you study their > history of patricide and fratricide, indeed, they are > the least 'noble' amongst any peoples anywhere in the > world! > > So, maybe you consider freedom fighters 'barbarous > murder gangs,' but I sir, consider them and the > American forefathers who fought and defeated the SAME > enemy, heroes! Maybe you think kissing the royal arse > to be 'noble,' I think you should research what > service was performed by your ancestor (maybe he > killed some helpless Catholic priests, or beat and > raped some nuns...maybe he killed babies for the crown > or imprisoned, tortured and starved some people in > India, or addicted some Chinese to opium as a royal > drug pusher, or sold slaves in the Americas or > Indies...or maybe he just killed some helpless, > un-armed and defenseless people somewhere else for the > glory or the crown and to expnad the empire?) and > maybe atone for those sins against humanity that built > the wealth of Elizabeth, Charles and his whore. > > I know this sounds bitterly strong, and indeed, I > apologize to the British subjects who would never > support such actions. I have friends in and from > England, and I know there are good, great and > even...yes, noble people in the territories of Great > Britain, some of whom like the royals for Arthurian, > romantic notions. I understand, even the idea of > somekind of a divine right of kings sounds reassuring. > > > But, please 'Sir,' do not assail the brave men and > women who died because one man (usually) thought he > should own and manage a people. A man who perhaps > killed his father or mother, a brother or sister with > the jealous notion that indeed, he should be > king....or his filthy and again, dare I say it, > inbreed children, grandchildren, etc...it's the same > as saying the only loyal Germans were Nazi's or > Russians were the communists...and maybe we should > salute Hitler's children or grandchildren. > > In the end, a king is nothing more or less that a > dictator who loves ceremony and ritual. A king can at > times be benevolent, yet he always holds his subjects > in a kind of bondage of infiority, even as a 'Sir' you > are 'beneath him and his family.' Throughout history, > these people have used people like chess pieces, pawns > and useless fodder only good for taxing and beating > into submission. > > Yes, in Ireland we too had kings, but there were > gatherings and votes, a kind of Irish democracy. > Serving YOUR royals was not loyal, it was serving a > foreign lord who was 'given' Ireland by a corrupt > Pope. I know and love the British people...they are > NOT the enemy. But Elizabeth and Charles are > charlitans at best and disgusting excuses for human > beings with no concience or feeling for anything but > their own pleasure. > > God Bless the Irish!~ > > Jim Riley > What a load of obnoxious twaddle. Always facinating how the terrorists and their friends try to portray cowardly murderers and common criminals as "heroes" and black as white. Do I really have to point out that these "heroes" and "feedom fighters" were the allies of first Kaiser Bill and the Grand Turk, and then, these having proven deficient, turned to Herr Hitler, who they certainly saluted? We British will have none of it! As for myself, I don't assume that I am better, I know it. That, after all, is the whole point of an hereditary honour from the Crown. Yours, etc. Sir Crispin Gaylord, Bt. p.s. grandpater certainly knew how to use the business end of a sword-bayonet