Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3700/10000
    1. MAXEY surname from Ireland
    2. Hugh Watkins
    3. from WDYTYA 2008 for Oliver MAxey [email protected] How far do irish records go back of MAXEY ? ======================= My notes are sketchy I ommitted dates and places Jonathan (Jack) MAXEY marreid Eileen (Kate) PARKER their child Jonathon MAXEY married Audey BARR-HAMILTON then with Carol LEVER (daughter of George LEVER) has a son Oliver MAXEY of http://olivermaxey.wordpress.com/ ========================== some deaths probaly no connection Record Audrey Maxey 17 Feb 1937 Sep 1988 51 Peterborough Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire View Record Audrey Maxey 12 May 1908 Oct 1997 89 Boston Lincolnshire View Record Audrey Margaret Maxey 25 Sep 1916 Nov 1997 81 Worksop Record Jack Maxey 21 Apr 1924 Aug 2003 79 Worthing West Sussex ===================================== census in 1901 Kate Maxey abt 1875 Tipperary, Ireland Servant Ifield, Sussex a hit at a county ============================= maxey Name Meaning and History 1. English: habitational name from a place in Northamptonshire, so named from the genitive case of the northern English personal name Mack + Old English eg 'island', 'low-lying land'. 2. Irish: variant of Mackesy, an Anglicized form of Gaelic Ó Macasa 'descendant of Macus', a personal name which is probably a form of Magnus. Dictionary of American Family Names, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-508137-4 ================================ Distribution of Mackesy Families in England and Wales in 1891 http://www.ancestry.com/facts/Mackesy-family-history-uk.ashx help please anyone? Hugh W

    05/25/2008 02:49:57
    1. Ancestors
    2. Does anyone know any Mc Canns from the Falls Rd Belfast?

    05/25/2008 11:50:00
    1. New in IGP Archives
    2. Christina Hunt
    3. New in General Ireland - Newspaper: Belfast Telegraph extracts for FORSYTHE Belfast Telegraph extracts for - MORROW, ROBINSON, SHANNON, HUNTER & HAWTHORNE You can find these from the main index by clicking on General Ireland and then Newspaper. General Ireland is the category where we put items that overlap areas. Also added to Wicklow: St.Patrick’s Church, Enniskerry, Co.Wicklow -- additional headstones. Also NEW - Newcastle Parish Church Cemetery (Church of Ireland). Hope this is of interest to some on the list. Christina Ireland Genealogy Projects Archives http://www.igp-web.com/IGPArchives/

    05/24/2008 01:07:43
    1. Re: Is there a genealogy Wiki anywhere?
    2. James W Anderson
    3. > I checked the page they have about Quebec church records. While not > exactly "wrong", it is very very outdated !!! It is like if it was > written 50 years ago, ignoring many recent tools or using another name > than the name used by the official editor. > > But would I help ? I prefer by far to have data I know to be accurate > and to have it on my site where I know I have the control on it, > instead of an external web site more or less depending on what they > have in Salt Lake City even if locally we have so many more tools... > > Denis They just put in the 'seed' info, the old outlines, so that we would have a framework to build the updated pages on. So by all means dive in and update the Quebec Church Records page you mentioned was way outdated. The way the wiki is supposed to work is that when someone comes across information in it that is stale, outdated, or otherwise wrong, to just go in and correct it. If you screw something up in the process, you can revert the edit and start again if necessary. Salt Lake knows that all the outlines are outdated, yes, they said that many have not been updated for years. Knowing that, and knowing that we need the latest information available to find ancestors and the records that were left about them, they set up the wiki. It's for everyone, not just those at the library who run it. They provide the site, run the hardware and some moderation activity, but it's up to us to update it. If anyone wants to update a page about a locality and make it a group effort, have at it. There has already been a successful effort on the National Library of Wales page where they have listed all the microfilm numbers on a subpage, so you can find it no matter where it was in the catalog as far as its listing, some were listed under one heading, while others were in other headings.

    05/23/2008 02:09:39
    1. Re: Origins Network
    2. JJM
    3. Mary, I dont think there is an 1841 Irish Census on Origins (or anywhere else either) What is very useful on Origins is the Griffith Valuation (c.1850) which lists all householders/landholders in Ireland. Also they have maps linked to Griffiths, so if you are very lucky you might be able to locate your ancestors house on a map. JM <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > Hi Theresa, > > Thank you and yes, I would like to work together. Just email me at my > home email address. > > The reason I wanted to know about Origins was the 1841 Census. I am > having difficulty in locating my gr-gr-grandparents and was hoping if I go > through each Census I might be able to find them. My gr-gr-grandfather > was Michael Dillon. The maiden name of my gr-gr-grandmother, Mary Dillon, > is confusing. On the marriage register of their daughter, my > gr-grandmother, has Mary's maiden name as Cannaught but on the pack of a > picture of her the maiden name is spelled Cinnaught. Another confusion is > the birth records for three of their daughters gives her maiden name as > Tinsley (Kinsley). Needless to say, my search for them has been very > frustrating, especially not knowing which county they immigrated from. I > don't know if you would be able to located them or not. > > About Ancestry, I have found a lot of information that I haven't been able > to find for free. The information on there has helped me further my > search. I will be more than happy to look on Ancestry for you. > > Thank you, > Mary Pettyjohn in Arkansas > > -------------- Original message -------------- > From: "Theresa Green" <[email protected]> > >> Hi Mary >> >> I've used Scottish Origins (which I believe is part of the same group) >> and it was brilliant! But, that may be because there's much more >> information recorded on Scottish BMDs. I thought it was very good >> value. At the moment, I have a subscription to "findmypast" which >> again, is very good value for money but they only have 2 counties of the >> 1901 census, which is a bit annoying as its that one particularly I need >> to see. With regard to Ancestry, I've not found anything on there that >> I couldn't have found for free. Maybe we could help each other out with >> these things? >> >> Best regards for now >> Theresa >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of [email protected] >> Sent: 21 May 2008 21:47 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Origins Network >> >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? Is it >> similar to Ancestry.com? >> >> Thank you and blessings, >> Mary >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> GTS Terms and Conditions of Work - >> http://www.glass-ts.com/PDFs/GTS_Terms_Conditions.pdf >> >> Please note you can now pay us via our payment gateways: >> British Glass - http://www.britglass.org.uk/payment.php GTS - >> http://www.glass-ts.com/payment/payment.php >> >> >> P please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >> >> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of >> the >> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information >> that >> is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If >> you are >> not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any >> dissemination, >> copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this >> message, >> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, >> please >> notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from >> your >> computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. >> >> Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free >> as >> information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late >> or >> incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept >> responsibility for >> any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any >> attachment, >> that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is >> required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions >> presented >> are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of >> the >> company. >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in >> the subject and the body of the message

    05/23/2008 08:40:57
    1. Re: NONE
    2. Natalie Drest
    3. "Don Moody" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > > "Coleen Coleman" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected] > > Am opting out, why? Well there is someone > > out there who shall remain anonymous that > > was not very cordial when responding to my > > request for help with my Brick Wall. Calls > > himself The Chief > > What a pathetic response. I don't know who The Chief is ... (snip usual vituperative invective) >... Ig anter searcher after knowledge cp,es up with a uestion, I expect it > to be properly formulated and to come with all the information > abailable so that the working can be critiques and any help required > can be given efficiently and without repeaing basic steps > unnecessarily. Pardon? Was that supposed to be Latin? > Now lok at your reord. Sloppily worded questions with insufficient > information... (snip the usual) Suggest you 'lok' at YOUR 'reord'. It appears somewhat sloppily worded. Research scientist, eh? > So go away. Same to you, crankypants. Thanks for the laughs! Mary Ann

    05/23/2008 07:05:02
    1. Re: NONE
    2. John H
    3. The Chief .....appears to be someone in Australia! John H "Don Moody" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected] > > "Coleen Coleman" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected] >> Am opting out, why? Well there is someone >> out there who shall remain anonymous that >> was not very cordial when responding to my >> request for help with my Brick Wall. Calls >> himself The Chief > > What a pathetic response. I don't know who The Chief is and don't speak > for him, but I do ntice that you are forever bringing up 'brick walls', > you perpetually give insufficient information, and as far as I remember > have never contributed anythin whatsoever to anybody else's problem. So > what are you wrth to sgi? Not a lot, and that is being polite. > > You seem to have no idea that a collective search for knowledge is not a > knitting houp at your local church where'cordiality' does and should > matter more than fact. If you want to partake n any -ology, then start > learning the rules of all -ologies and play by them. If you want to live > on the like-dislike axis, keep out of all -ologies, ll searching for > knowledge. They exist n the true-false axis. It doesn't matter a damn to > me as a scientist whether I think somebody is cordial or otherwise. I only > look at the results he or she claims to have obtaind, and the extent to > which those results can be trusted necause the workmanship in producing > them was sound and the logic was precise. > > Ig anter searcher after knowledge cp,es up with a uestion, I expect it to > be properly formulated and to come with all the information abailable so > that the working can be critiques and any help required can be given > efficiently and without repeaing basic steps unnecessarily. It matters not > the slightest in my handling of such a question whether personally I hate > the guts of the other or love 'em to death. > > Now lok at your reord. Sloppily worded questions with insufficient > information calling for other people to do the work which you are > evidently too idle or incompetent to do yourself. I'm only surprised you > didn't get chewed off ages ago. > > So go away. While you are away make upyour mind whether you want a nice, > pretty, social cjat or whether you want to do the search for knowledge > which is genealogy. If you want 'cordiality', good luck and I hope you > enjoy yourself. For the vast majority f humanity that is indeed the best > way to go.It is what makes the world rub along 'as is'. > > But that approach is hopeless for changing the wrld u acquiring and using > knowledge. Telling people to THINK is about as anti-social as one can get. > Well, in knowledge seaqrching you've got to THINK allthe time. You've got > to work hard and long. You've got to construct theories, expose them t > critique by your felows. and see all their weakneeses exposed or even the > whole theory demolished. Meanwhile youare doing the same service to other > seekers after knowledge. Of course it gets rough, but so what? That is > part of the price. > > A long while ago an Irishman, George Bernard Shaw, summed it up. > Reasonable men conform themselves to the world;unreasonable men change the > world to fit themselves; therefore all progress comes from unreasonable > men. > > There is a genealogical point to that. When GBS was moved to write those > words he was in one of his occasional partnerships with the most > unresonable man he knew. My greatgrandfather. > > . If you are not a natural change-maker, get out of genealogy and every > other -ology. Staying inwill only get you more upset. . We change-makers > will go on doing it the way we do it because we know that n the long-run > it works and it is self-correcting. You won't ever sell us 'cordiality' > instead ogf 'truth'. > > You wo't like the foregoing analysis but, by definition, I don't care > whether you like it or not. It is, however ,well-intentioned, It is aimed > at avoiding you getting hurt any more. > > Don >> > >

    05/23/2008 02:10:57
    1. McCullagh at Ardee
    2. Jack Bauer
    3. Does anyone have any connections with the McCullagh family at Ardee, Louth ?

    05/22/2008 08:36:15
    1. Re: Origins Network
    2. Hi Charani, Thank you for your input. I appreciate it and it is true that I am the only one who can decide whether it is worth it or not. Best wishes, Mary Pettyjohn in Arkansas -------------- Original message -------------- From: Charani <[email protected]> > On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:47:03 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? > > Only you can decide if it's worth the money. Give it a try and see. > > Some people will say it's rubbish, others will say it's brilliant. > > Ultimately, it's your decision. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

    05/22/2008 04:28:19
    1. RE: Origins Network
    2. Hi Theresa, Thank you and yes, I would like to work together. Just email me at my home email address. The reason I wanted to know about Origins was the 1841 Census. I am having difficulty in locating my gr-gr-grandparents and was hoping if I go through each Census I might be able to find them. My gr-gr-grandfather was Michael Dillon. The maiden name of my gr-gr-grandmother, Mary Dillon, is confusing. On the marriage register of their daughter, my gr-grandmother, has Mary's maiden name as Cannaught but on the pack of a picture of her the maiden name is spelled Cinnaught. Another confusion is the birth records for three of their daughters gives her maiden name as Tinsley (Kinsley). Needless to say, my search for them has been very frustrating, especially not knowing which county they immigrated from. I don't know if you would be able to located them or not. About Ancestry, I have found a lot of information that I haven't been able to find for free. The information on there has helped me further my search. I will be more than happy to look on Ancestry for you. Thank you, Mary Pettyjohn in Arkansas -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Theresa Green" <[email protected]> > Hi Mary > > I've used Scottish Origins (which I believe is part of the same group) > and it was brilliant! But, that may be because there's much more > information recorded on Scottish BMDs. I thought it was very good > value. At the moment, I have a subscription to "findmypast" which > again, is very good value for money but they only have 2 counties of the > 1901 census, which is a bit annoying as its that one particularly I need > to see. With regard to Ancestry, I've not found anything on there that > I couldn't have found for free. Maybe we could help each other out with > these things? > > Best regards for now > Theresa > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: 21 May 2008 21:47 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Origins Network > > Hi, > > Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? Is it > similar to Ancestry.com? > > Thank you and blessings, > Mary > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > GTS Terms and Conditions of Work - > http://www.glass-ts.com/PDFs/GTS_Terms_Conditions.pdf > > Please note you can now pay us via our payment gateways: > British Glass - http://www.britglass.org.uk/payment.php GTS - > http://www.glass-ts.com/payment/payment.php > > > P please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that > is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are > not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your > computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. > > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as > information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for > any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any attachment, > that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is > required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions presented > are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the > company. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

    05/22/2008 04:26:22
    1. Re: NONE
    2. The Chief
    3. On May 22, 12:00 pm, "Don Moody" <[email protected]> wrote: > "Coleen Coleman" <[email protected]> wrote in message > > news:[email protected] > > > Am opting out, why? Well there is someone > > out there who shall remain anonymous that > > was not very cordial when responding to my > > request for help with my Brick Wall. Calls > > himself The Chief > > Now lok at your reord. Sloppily worded questions with insufficient > information calling for other people to do the work which you are > evidently too idle or incompetent to do yourself. I'm only surprised > you didn't get chewed off ages ago. Amen. "Coleen" has her "brick walls" because she appears to be as thick as a brick. Good riddance to bad cess I say. Regards, The Chief > > > Don > >

    05/22/2008 02:32:33
    1. Re: Is there a genealogy Wiki anywhere?
    2. Hugh Watkins
    3. James W Anderson wrote: > The FamilySearch Wiki is growing, they need your help. From today's > User Group Meeting (which I attended live and those outside the area > can attend via Adobe Connect for now: > > 5. Have state, country, county coordinators. Could we > advertize this need on a portal page? Coordinators should have > genealogical experience? Have a way to give feedback on coordinators/ > moderators so those that are not effective can be evaluated and > changed as needed. > 5. Volunteers for moderators > > Jimmy: Idaho, Indians of North America > Lisa: Tennessee > Darris: Wales > David: New York, Oregon, Luxembourg, Germany > > This would work like USGenweb/WorldGenweb if it works out, have > coordinators for counties and states in the US and countries > > There need to be alot more than the 1660 or so people that are on as > of this writing. > > Also note the forums link on the left of any wiki page as well. You > can ask research questions there. The wiki will be for posting > information about records, repositories, research strategies, etc. > Almost all the other wikis I've seen have to do with surnames and the > like, this is the only one focused on actual research resources and > strategies. > > You do not have to be LDS to participate, although they are providing > the resources and the technical backing for the project. Jump in, > edit your areas of knowledge. They anticipate it being used by > millions on a regular basis. The site uses the latest version of the > Wikimedia software, so it is up to date technically as well. > > http://wiki.familysearch.org/ > > Forums: http://forums.familysearchsupport.org/index.php > > A note on registration which is needed for editing on the wiki and > posting on the forums other than those for feedback on the wiki: > Sorry no single signin yet for both projects, but they are working on > that technical issue. Best to use the same username on both if you do > so that when they do the transition will be smoother for you. thank you for the update I will probaly update move my existing FAQ there when I get round to it Hugh W -- For genealogy and help with family and local history in Bristol and district http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Brycgstow/ http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

    05/22/2008 11:58:38
    1. Banteer info please
    2. Dianne
    3. I have just joined the group and was wondering if anyone could help with information about Banteer Co Cork in the 1850's, and especially St Fursey's Church there. My ancestors Owen O'Neill and Catherine Foley married there in 1851, before emmigrating to Australia on the Northern Light in 1857. Thanks from Di in Australia

    05/22/2008 11:44:18
    1. Davitt
    2. katy
    3. Does anyone out there have a tree for Michael Davitt, the Fenian? There was one posted at Roots.Web a number of years ago, but at that time, we didn't know he was of interest to our family. I am trying to trace our relationship to him through other Davitt's, in particular those that migrated from Islandeady, Co Mayo to the Green Isle, MN region. I have information on Davitt's in MN, but have been unable to make the link to Michael Davitt so far. He would be, I think, some kind of cousin, since the Davitt's in my tree would have lived at the same time he did. Thanks for consideration.

    05/22/2008 10:54:04
    1. Re: NONE
    2. Charani
    3. On Wed, 21 May 2008 06:41:33 -0600, Coleen Coleman wrote: > Am opting out, why? Well there is someone > out there who shall remain anonymous that > was not very cordial when responding to my > request for help with my Brick Wall. Calls > himself The Chief Ignore him, killfile him, whichever suits you best but don't be bullied into quitting on your ancestors. They are worth more than that and this group/list has bigger than just one misog.

    05/22/2008 04:12:15
    1. Re: Origins Network
    2. Charani
    3. On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:47:03 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? Only you can decide if it's worth the money. Give it a try and see. Some people will say it's rubbish, others will say it's brilliant. Ultimately, it's your decision. hey only have 2 counties of the > 1901 census, which is a bit annoying as its that one particularly I need > to see. They only have the two *at the moment* but they intend having the whole of the 1901 and the 1851 by the end of this year. They are also hoping to get the images for the 1881 but that's not going to be for a while since they do have the transcripts.

    05/22/2008 04:09:38
    1. RE: Origins Network
    2. Theresa Green
    3. Hi Mary I've used Scottish Origins (which I believe is part of the same group) and it was brilliant! But, that may be because there's much more information recorded on Scottish BMDs. I thought it was very good value. At the moment, I have a subscription to "findmypast" which again, is very good value for money but they only have 2 counties of the 1901 census, which is a bit annoying as its that one particularly I need to see. With regard to Ancestry, I've not found anything on there that I couldn't have found for free. Maybe we could help each other out with these things? Best regards for now Theresa From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 21 May 2008 21:47 To: [email protected] Subject: Origins Network Hi, Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? Is it similar to Ancestry.com? Thank you and blessings, Mary ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message GTS Terms and Conditions of Work - http://www.glass-ts.com/PDFs/GTS_Terms_Conditions.pdf Please note you can now pay us via our payment gateways: British Glass - http://www.britglass.org.uk/payment.php GTS - http://www.glass-ts.com/payment/payment.php P please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

    05/22/2008 02:15:24
    1. Re: Excerpts from Irish newspapers
    2. Dennis Ahern
    3. >From The Cork Examiner, 15 July 1865 - THE WEATHER. -------- DURING the last few days a good deal of rain has fallen, and the character of the weather has been, on the whole, rather gloomy. Last night the rain fall was exceedingly heavy, and it was accompanied by a strong wind from the S.S.W. From an early hour this morning the harbour, and the sea outside for a considerable distance along the coast was covered by a dense fog. The weather was so thick that the R.M.S. Asia, the homeward bound American steamer, had nearly entered the harbour before she was observed from Roche's Point. The fog lifted about ten o'clock, and the weather has since been fine though there are still threatenings of more rain. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dennis Ahern | Ireland Newspaper Abstracts Acton, Massachusetts | http://www.IrelandOldNews.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    05/21/2008 04:15:15
    1. Origins Network
    2. Hi, Does anyone know if the Origins Network is worth the money? Is it similar to Ancestry.com? Thank you and blessings, Mary

    05/21/2008 02:47:03
    1. Re: NONE
    2. Eddy Landzaat
    3. [email protected] (Coleen Coleman) beitelde in het scherm news:[email protected] : > Am opting out, why? Well there is someone > out there who shall remain anonymous that > was not very cordial when responding to my > request for help with my Brick Wall. Calls > himself The Chief > Always look at the bright side of live! Some people are grumpy, some are helpfull... Ignore The Chief and look what the rest has on offer. -- Eddy Landzaat ================================================================ Altijd op zoek naar de familie Van Veen in Utrecht en Amsterdam. Zie ook mijn website: http://www.landzaat.info Weblog: http://desprong.blogspot.com ================================================================

    05/21/2008 02:18:57