I think we are critiquing Ancestry in the same way. So I don’t think it’s harsh. Their number one reason is privacy which they seemed to be extremely cautious about. Not a good ground for revealing more information. As for the rest, I’ve tried to get into contact with them to work with them. No answer to any email. On the contrary 23andMe has been not only communicating via email promptly to my request (with a little help of Twitter), but it was their CEO directly responding and I had a meeting with their Chief Data Architect. So no, I don’t think I’m too harsh here. But if you are speaking to Bennett again, please do forward my email as we are still interested to work with them. Andreas > On 4 Nov 2017, at 11:44, Jim Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andreas - a little harsh... I've spoken with Bennett and the leadership team at FTDNA. They are interested in a Triangulation tool, and have worked on one before. As you can attest, it's not an easy thing to program, and make sure it's 100% right every time. > > > Jim Bartlett > [email protected] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas West <[email protected]> > To: genealogy-dna <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Nov 3, 2017 11:31 pm > Subject: [DNA] FTDNA > > Hi Doris,How we wish it would be FTDNA’s tool but you can wait until the last day on Earth that you get good user experience, speed and a Triangulation tool (not ICW) on FTDNA.Maybe when someone else takes over the company. But I doubt.Andreas> On 3 Nov 2017, at 23:34, Doris Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote:> > , Their new Triangulator tool is great, > > Doris Wheeler -------------------------------To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message