The test we want to see from the new tool is not the confirmation of a known triangulation group. Rather, we want to see what happens when the two sides who appear to share a segment actually don’t match each other, because one is a paternal cousin and the other a maternal cousin. If the new tool can correctly determine that those two sides do not match each other, then the tool does in fact have access to the missing third side. John McCoy ([email protected]) Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 24, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Andreas West <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Working on that now that someone has found what we were not able to find despite a lot of time spend on FTDNA ;-) > > This was the missing piece that hold us back from pushing FTDNA forward (as before we were dependant on our shared matches to give us this crucial information). And yes, tried it out myself and can confirm what Jim posted that it reflects TG’s that I had already from other services. Expect more news on our Facebook page. > > Andreas > > Andreas West > Meine Vorfahren / my ancestors (8 generations): http://www.wikitree.com/treewidget/Basso-23/5 <http://www.wikitree.com/treewidget/Basso-23/5> > Author of https://www.dnagenealogy.tools <https://www.dnagenealogy.tools/> > > Follow us on Facebook for latest updates on our progress - https://www.facebook.com/dnagenealogy.tools/ <https://www.facebook.com/dnagenealogy.tools/> > >> On Oct24, 2017, at 21:25, Jim Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Now, if we could just turn it on at night and wake up with all TGs formed.... >> >> Jim Bartlett - atDNA blog: www.segmentology.org > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message