Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [DNA] update
    2. Kuba Krchak
    3. Interesting how our perceiption differs. On the OE, I am able to programmatically generate my comparisons and save them to a DB. I have dozens of new matches fully triangulated, checked and saved in less then an hour. On TNE I have completely gave up. Doing the same as above would take me days (some of my triangulation groups have 50 or even 80 members). [Just "clicking in" a single person against that TG is something I am not willing to go through. We need a REST API for the DNA Relatives of TNE.] Kind regards, Kuba On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 at 17:09, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Given that the old 5 worked barely (entering a character took about 5 > seconds), I'm happy that the New Experience 5 vs 1 is back up. > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Update? (Kuba Krchak) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:02:51 +0000 > From: Kuba Krchak > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DNA] Update? > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Yes, > > it is the 1v5 from the old experience. > Your cookies are redirecting you to TNE. > > K. > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 18:07, wrote: > > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; Well, I've never seen this URL (I don't think)--unless it's the 5 > matches > &gt; vs 1, but that's not the URL I recognize. But it came up "Update in > &gt; Prograss too." > &gt; So does anyone have a timetable for how long 23 is supposed to be > down? > &gt; John L > &gt; > &gt; From: Kuba Krchak > &gt; To: [email protected] > &gt; Subject: Re: [DNA] Update? > &gt; Message-ID: > &gt; > &gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > &gt; > &gt; &gt;From 23andMe I am only using the > &gt; https://www.23andme.com/you/labs/multi_ibd > &gt; interface capable of programmatically comparing my matches. That is > working > &gt; fine. > &gt; > &gt; Kind regards, > &gt; Kuba > &gt; > &gt; On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Doris Wheeler wrote: > &gt; > &gt; &gt; Me too. > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Ann Turner wrote: > &gt; &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; ------------------------------- > &gt; To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > &gt; [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > &gt; the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > &gt; > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > To contact the GENEALOGY-DNA list administrator, send an email to > [email protected] > > To post a message to the GENEALOGY-DNA mailing list, send an email to > [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body > of the > email with no additional text. > > > ------------------------------ > > End of GENEALOGY-DNA Digest, Vol 12, Issue 612 > ********************************************** > &nbsp; > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    09/01/2017 11:24:36
    1. Re: [DNA] update
    2. Jim Bartlett
    3. Kuba I, too, would like to see an automatic updating program - from 23andMe or some 3rd party. In the meantime..... I download the whole DNA Relatives list; adjust to my master spreadsheet format (including adding a color coded column to distinguish all of these rows); append to my spreadsheet; sort the whole thing by 23andMe kits and Name; then look down the whole 23andMe list adding a tick for each new row (usually an all-nighter); then resort to delete all new rows except the ticked new ones; then sort only the 23andMe rows by Chr and Start. This puts all the new 23andMe Match-segments intermingled in the two potential previously determined Triangulated Groups. All prior analysis is preserved. Then a long slog to determine the correct TG (or side) for each new one. It goes pretty fast because there is a link (included in the download) that take you straight to the Match's page - just scroll down to the ICW list and check the "Yes" Matches - they will all be in the TG on one side (none on the other TG). Frequently this review includes some of the other new segments - so include them new! , easily, in the same TG. Often another long evening - I do this at 23andMe about every 3 months with a few hundred new segments. I have a standard message (one paternal, one maternal) with links to my Tree, blog, and a list of Patriarch for that side. As long as I'm on the Match's page, I paste that in to the adjacent message box. If 23andMe just included a date for each Match in the download spreadsheet, it would cut my time considerably. If there is a more efficient way - I'd welcome it. Jim Bartlett - atDNA blog: www.segmentology.org > On Sep 1, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Kuba Krchak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interesting how our perceiption differs. On the OE, I am able to > programmatically generate my comparisons and save them to a DB. > I have dozens of new matches fully triangulated, checked and saved in less > then an hour. > > On TNE I have completely gave up. Doing the same as above would take me > days (some of my triangulation groups have 50 or even 80 members). > [Just "clicking in" a single person against that TG is something I am not > willing to go through. We need a REST API for the DNA Relatives of TNE.] > > Kind regards, > Kuba

    09/01/2017 09:13:06