Not make you provide it to help *convict* your brother.You willingly provide it to prove that the DNA of your brother, is actually a lab mixup.That's what is being discussed -----Original Message----- From: Robert T Wyatt <robert.wyatt@gmail.com> To: Wjhonson <wjhonson@aol.com>; genealogy-dna <genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> Cc: odoniv <odoniv@yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2018 9:39 am Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Use of familial search by law enforcement No, I'm saying that you can't make me provide my DNA in order to help convict my brother. Wjhonson wrote: Of course it's a legal one. Are you saying that if your brother were to be convicted on DNA evidence, you would not also be willing to submit your own DNA to prove that it's not his DNA at all? -----Original Message----- From: Robert T Wyatt <robert.wyatt@gmail.com> To: genealogy-dna <genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> Cc: odoniv <odoniv@yahoo.com>; Wjhonson <wjhonson@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2018 7:34 am Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Use of familial search by law enforcement That may be a scientific solution, but it's not a legal one. Wjhonson via GENEALOGY-DNA wrote: > This objection is easily overcome > Not only do you test the subject, you also test their parent, sibling, nephew, etc to prove that the original kit was not contaminated. >  > 

Ah, my apologies for getting it turned around. Wjhonson wrote: > Not make you provide it to help *convict* your brother. > You willingly provide it to prove that the DNA of your brother, is > actually a lab mixup. > That's what is being discussed > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert T Wyatt <robert.wyatt@gmail.com> > To: Wjhonson <wjhonson@aol.com>; genealogy-dna > <genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> > Cc: odoniv <odoniv@yahoo.com> > Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2018 9:39 am > Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Use of familial search by law enforcement > > No, I'm saying that you can't make me provide my DNA in order to help > convict my brother. > > Wjhonson wrote: >> Of course it's a legal one. >> Are you saying that if your brother were to be convicted on DNA >> evidence, you would not also be willing to submit your own DNA to >> prove that it's not his DNA at all? >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert T Wyatt <robert.wyatt@gmail.com> >> <mailto:robert.wyatt@gmail.com> >> To: genealogy-dna <genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> >> <mailto:genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> >> Cc: odoniv <odoniv@yahoo.com> <mailto:odoniv@yahoo.com>; Wjhonson >> <wjhonson@aol.com> <mailto:wjhonson@aol.com> >> Sent: Wed, Nov 28, 2018 7:34 am >> Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Use of familial search by law enforcement >> >> That may be a scientific solution, but it's not a legal one. >> >> >> Wjhonson via GENEALOGY-DNA wrote: >> > This objection is easily overcome >> > Not only do you test the subject, you also test their parent, >> sibling, nephew, etc to prove that the original kit was not contaminated. >> > >> > >> >