I don't know what you actually call those spots.  They seem too small to be called an allele.  In any event, what they call 1M, 2M etc. On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:49:45 -0400, Jim Bartlett wrote: 330,000 SNPs seems high... Jim - www.segmentology.org > On Oct 24, 2015, at 11:51 AM, jlerch1 via wrote: > > To be specific, you're saying that there never can be a stretch where > 10 cM is compressed into 330,000 SNPs? I don't know. I know there are > some pretty fragile spots. On all my allegedly pileup spots, the > middles which everyone shares is some unknown # but the difference > between persons at the ends can be quite large, certainly 1 cM in > about 100,000 SNPs. DHamill wrote > Subject: Re: [DNA] GENEALOGY-DNA Digest, Vol 10, Issue 576 > To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > I don?t think these results can both be correct. Not just a > difference in criteria for a match or strictness of guidelines etc. > If they really are reporting these results, I think there is > something computationally rotten in Denmark. Maybe you could start by > just double-checking these numbers.. just to be sure there are no > typos etc involved? > > Does anyone else have a segment with about the same start and stop > locations? ? if so how many cM? > >>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 5:51 PM, genealogy-dna-request@rootsweb.com wrote: >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Family via >>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:29 AM >> FTDNA >>> 9 131,456,657 137,335,024 8.85 1955 >>> >>> >>> gedmatch near identical boundaries and SNPs, but cMs are much larger: >>> 9 131,390,868 137,505,316 18.8 1,904 > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GENEALOGY-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message