To be specific, you're saying that there never can be a stretch where 10 cM is compressed into  330,000 SNPs?  I don't know.  I know there are some pretty fragile spots.  On all my allegedly pileup spots, the middles which everyone shares is some unknown # but the difference between persons at the ends can be quite large, certainly 1 cM in about 100,000 SNPs. DHamill wrote Subject: Re: [DNA] GENEALOGY-DNA Digest, Vol 10, Issue 576 To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com Message-ID: <14F5C288-84FF-4323-8A1D-93B5440D9B43@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I don?t think these results can both be correct. Not just a difference in criteria for a match or strictness of guidelines etc. If they really are reporting these results, I think there is something computationally rotten in Denmark. Maybe you could start by just double-checking these numbers.. just to be sure there are no typos etc involved? Does anyone else have a segment with about the same start and stop locations? ? if so how many cM? > On Oct 23, 2015, at 5:51 PM, genealogy-dna-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Family via >> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:29 AM > FTDNA >> 9 131,456,657 137,335,024 8.85 1955 >> >> >> gedmatch near identical boundaries and SNPs, but cMs are much larger: >> 9 131,390,868 137,505,316 18.8 1,904

330,000 SNPs seems high... Jim - www.segmentology.org > On Oct 24, 2015, at 11:51 AM, jlerch1 via <genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > To be specific, you're saying that there never can be a stretch where 10 cM is compressed into 330,000 SNPs? I don't know. I know there are some pretty fragile spots. On all my allegedly pileup spots, the middles which everyone shares is some unknown # but the difference between persons at the ends can be quite large, certainly 1 cM in about 100,000 SNPs. > > DHamill wrote > Subject: Re: [DNA] GENEALOGY-DNA Digest, Vol 10, Issue 576 > To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <14F5C288-84FF-4323-8A1D-93B5440D9B43@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > I don?t think these results can both be correct. Not just a difference in criteria for a match or strictness of guidelines etc. If they really are reporting these results, I think there is something computationally rotten in Denmark. > > Maybe you could start by just double-checking these numbers.. just to be sure there are no typos etc involved? > > Does anyone else have a segment with about the same start and stop locations? ? if so how many cM? > >>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 5:51 PM, genealogy-dna-request@rootsweb.com wrote: >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Family via >>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:29 AM >> FTDNA >>> 9 131,456,657 137,335,024 8.85 1955 >>> >>> >>> gedmatch near identical boundaries and SNPs, but cMs are much larger: >>> 9 131,390,868 137,505,316 18.8 1,904 > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GENEALOGY-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message