Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3420/10000
    1. Re: [GenCT] 1900 & 1910 Census for 651 Prospect Street, New Haven, New Haven, CT
    2. Allen & Darlene Dowhaniuk
    3. Hi Dee, I may have found him in 1900 census living with a family as a State child: 1910 census: Name: Warren Randall Home in 1900: Saugus, Essex, Massachusetts Age: 3 Estimated birth year: 1897 Birthplace: Massachusetts Race: White Relationship to head-of-house: Boarder Occupation: View Image Image source: Year: 1900; Census Place: Saugus, Essex, Massachusetts; Roll: T623 648; Page: 6A; Enumeration District: 463. Living with Benjamin Emmons -boarder- State child Kind regards Darlene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dee Randall" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:14 AM Subject: [GenCT] 1900 & 1910 Census for 651 Prospect Street, New Haven, New Haven, CT > I am wondering if anyone can tell me if the St. Francis Orphanage, 651 Prospect Street, New Haven, New Haven Co., listed the name of their orphans on the census'. > I am looking for Warren P. Randall, b. 1897, and was in the orphanage. > > Thank you. > Dee Randall > >

    03/31/2005 01:56:43
    1. HALL family
    2. Martha Winters
    3. Dear Listers, I am having a very hard time working my way back through my John Hall family. This is what I have: John HALL b. ?ca 1730 no parents known m. 14 Dec 1752 Mary WILLIS, Middletown, CT When he is called "carpenter" [in Barbour] d. ? Mary WILLIS b. ?ca 1734 no parents known d. 1 Oct 1762, Middletown, CT [in Barbour] John HALL II b. 22 Jan 1753 Middletown, CT [in Barbour] m. Hannah NICHOLS ?ca 1780 no location d. 11 Jul 1830 prob Hartford [Boston newspaper report, no Boston death cert., Hartford Ch records NEHGS, not in Barbur Hartford] If anyone sees a link or has a suggestion of where I can jump next...I surely would appreciate it. There surely have been many times that I wishes for a more distinctive name. I have diligently searched the Middletown CT Barbour and then I purchased the Hartford Barbour thinking that would be the answer to my prayers...and nothing. Regards, Martha Winters [email protected]

    03/27/2005 09:02:10
    1. County Leitrim, Ireland - Faughnan, Faulkner, Doherty, Cannon
    2. Sherry Doherty
    3. Looking for information on any New Haven Faughnan families (changed to Faulkner/Falkner by some). Also, surnames of Doherty, and Cannon as well. These were Irish families that had emigrated from County Leitrim, Ireland. www.faughnan.org <http://www.faughnan.org/>

    03/26/2005 12:25:23
    1. Re: GenConnecticut-D Digest V05 #33
    2. Yes North Guilford and New Haven are in the same county.The towns go: Guilford Branford New Haven They are all on the shoreline of Connecticut. USA Hope this helps you, Jane USA

    03/26/2005 11:53:39
    1. Chittenden/North Guilford
    2. I believe that North Guilford would be in New Haven County, CT. My line of Bartlett and Coan descend from North Guilford. Frances

    03/25/2005 07:52:53
    1. Re: [GenCT] Bunnell, Chittenden, Ross, Whittlesey, Day, Harpending, Marsh, Moffitt, etc.
    2. Edwin and Cornelia Moore
    3. yes, Cindy, for many years to little avail. Azariah is not listed beyond what a friend listed there for me, nor are the Chittenden girls listed. they _might_ be from MA, though most of what I have for them points to CT. both of the Chittenden girls died before 1840, so tracing them through common sources (i.e. census) is difficult. I've tried to find them through...I'm too tired right now to recall it's proper name, but there's an index to CT papers and records. they don't show up in the index. 'nite Cornelia -- Norton Antivirus protected ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy Lou" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [GenCT] Bunnell, Chittenden, Ross, Whittlesey, Day, Harpending, Marsh, Moffitt, etc. > Have you check the LDS files yet? I know the Chittenden name was in North > Guilford at one time which is Middlesex county. > > Cindy lou Burgess > Bristol, Ct > Researching Hay,Bacon, > Lawler, Stannard, > Struzinski,Dziemit, > Spak,Singer > Smith, Wentworth, > Burgess,Paterson > > >

    03/24/2005 03:42:42
    1. Re: [GenCT] Bunnell, Chittenden, Ross, Whittlesey, Day, Harpending, Marsh, Mo...
    2. In a message dated 3/24/2005 8:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: > I know the Chittenden name was in North > Guilford at one time which is Middlesex county. > And Clinton, CT as well. Carol Boggs

    03/24/2005 02:51:26
    1. Re: [GenCT] Bunnell, Chittenden, Ross, Whittlesey, Day, Harpending, Marsh, Moffitt, etc.
    2. Cindy Lou
    3. Have you check the LDS files yet? I know the Chittenden name was in North Guilford at one time which is Middlesex county. Cindy lou Burgess Bristol, Ct Researching Hay,Bacon, Lawler, Stannard, Struzinski,Dziemit, Spak,Singer Smith, Wentworth, Burgess,Paterson

    03/24/2005 01:38:57
    1. Re: [GenCT] Eggleston-Palmer
    2. Penny Hommeyer
    3. Hello Cheryl.. I saw your message this morning.. I have a Sarah EGGLESTON in my line.. I have to go back and look at the sources on this but the info I have is that she was born about 1628, perhaps in Biddenden, Kent, England, married a John NUTTING in Woburn, MA in 1650, had 7 children.. the 3rd of whom is my ancestor Mary NUTTING who was born jan 16th 1655/56 in Connecticut somewhere.. John and Sarah Eggleston Nutting show up in Groton, MA by 1663.. perhaps earlier... does any of this match any Eggleston info that you have? thanks... penny On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:20:43 EST, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Eggleston family came from Settrington, Yorkshire, England. Most all if > not all the New England Eggleston clan can connect to Bygod Eggleston, b. > February 20, 1586/87, Settrington, Yorkshire, England, d. September 01, 1674, > Windsor, Connecticut, British Colonies, wife was Mary Wall. I am part of that > linage. > > Here are some notes I have on the Eggleston line in America. > Baptized in All Saints Church at Settrington, East Riding, (now North > Yorkshire) England 1587-02-20 Settrington, Yorkshire, England (1586 old-style) > > He came over from England on the ship Mary & John, which sailed from > Plymouth, England on 1630-03-20, just a few days ahead of the Winthrop Fleet of > 1630. They landed ten weeks later at Dorchester, Massachusetts. About 1635 he > moved to Windsor, Connecticut, which is at the confluence of the Farmington and > Connecticut Rivers. Windsor is about six miles north of where the city of > Hartford stands today. > > He brought to the colonies with him three sons, James, John and Samuel. A > daughter Mary, another son James, and his first wife, are assumed to have died > before Bygod left England and little else is known about them. > > He married again, Mary, and again, her surname is unknown. Together they had > seven children; Thomas, Mercy (Marcy), Sarah, Rebecca (Deborah), Abigail, > Joseph and Benjamin. Bygod was fined 20 shillings in 1645 for "bequeathing his > wife to a young man." The young man, a George Tuckye, was fined 40 shillings, > but he took off and didn't pay. > > Bygod survived his second wife as well, and married for a third and final > time. Once again, her name is unknown. No known children came of this marriage. > > Much uncertainty about his mother. Could be Margaret Harker > > First Settlers of Windsor, Connecticut > Recorded in the Town Records of 1640, > five years after their removal from Dorchester; > New England Historical & Genealogical Register > Volume 5, July 1851, p 365 - 366 > > Henry WOLCOTT, Esq. > Humphrey PINNEY > Thomas DRIBBLE > Richard VORE > Bigot EGLESTON > Edward GRISWOLD > Daniel CLARK > Roger LUDLOW, Esq. > John PORTER > John TAYLOR > Aaron COOK > Owen TUDOR > Richard OLDAGE > George PHILLIPS > Thomas BARBER > Isaac SHELDEN > Brag ROSSITER > Roger WILLIAMS > Thos. THRONTON, No. 56 > William PHELPS > Walter FILER > Saml. PHELPS > John DRAKE > George PHELPS > John BISSEL > Peter TILTON > Joseph LOOMIS > William HILL > Eltwed POMEROY > Elias PARKMAN > Capt. John MASON > Henry STILES > John STRONG > Nicolas PALMER > Robert WATSON > Thomas DEWEY > Thos. BASCOMB > John WHITFIELD > Matthew GRANT > Nathan GILLET > Abraham RANDALL > Thomas FORD > Thomas HOLCOMB > Messrs. NEWBERRY > John LOOMIS > James MARSHALL > Wm. HOSFORD > Thomas STOUGHTON > Matthew ALLYN > Wm. HAYDEN > John HILLYER > Thomas BUCKLAND > Stephen TERRY > Wm. HURLBERT > Nicholas DENSLOW > List of Freemen of Windsor, CT. > Submitted by Samuel Wolcott, 1 Mar 1850 > Oct 7th, 1669. Acount taken of all such persons as dwell within the limets > of Windsor, and have bin approved of to be freemen, and alowed to take the > oath of freedom. > EGELSTON, Beagat > EGELSTON, James > EGELSTON, Thomas > EGELSTON, Josiah > > Cheryl > >

    03/24/2005 03:36:21
    1. Re: [GenCT] Eggleston-Palmer
    2. Thank you Cheryl, so very much. Regards, Joyce

    03/23/2005 04:25:00
    1. Re: [GenCT] Eggleston-Palmer
    2. Eggleston family came from Settrington, Yorkshire, England. Most all if not all the New England Eggleston clan can connect to Bygod Eggleston, b. February 20, 1586/87, Settrington, Yorkshire, England, d. September 01, 1674, Windsor, Connecticut, British Colonies, wife was Mary Wall. I am part of that linage. Here are some notes I have on the Eggleston line in America. Baptized in All Saints Church at Settrington, East Riding, (now North Yorkshire) England 1587-02-20 Settrington, Yorkshire, England (1586 old-style) He came over from England on the ship Mary & John, which sailed from Plymouth, England on 1630-03-20, just a few days ahead of the Winthrop Fleet of 1630. They landed ten weeks later at Dorchester, Massachusetts. About 1635 he moved to Windsor, Connecticut, which is at the confluence of the Farmington and Connecticut Rivers. Windsor is about six miles north of where the city of Hartford stands today. He brought to the colonies with him three sons, James, John and Samuel. A daughter Mary, another son James, and his first wife, are assumed to have died before Bygod left England and little else is known about them. He married again, Mary, and again, her surname is unknown. Together they had seven children; Thomas, Mercy (Marcy), Sarah, Rebecca (Deborah), Abigail, Joseph and Benjamin. Bygod was fined 20 shillings in 1645 for "bequeathing his wife to a young man." The young man, a George Tuckye, was fined 40 shillings, but he took off and didn't pay. Bygod survived his second wife as well, and married for a third and final time. Once again, her name is unknown. No known children came of this marriage. Much uncertainty about his mother. Could be Margaret Harker First Settlers of Windsor, Connecticut Recorded in the Town Records of 1640, five years after their removal from Dorchester; New England Historical & Genealogical Register Volume 5, July 1851, p 365 - 366 Henry WOLCOTT, Esq. Humphrey PINNEY Thomas DRIBBLE Richard VORE Bigot EGLESTON Edward GRISWOLD Daniel CLARK Roger LUDLOW, Esq. John PORTER John TAYLOR Aaron COOK Owen TUDOR Richard OLDAGE George PHILLIPS Thomas BARBER Isaac SHELDEN Brag ROSSITER Roger WILLIAMS Thos. THRONTON, No. 56 William PHELPS Walter FILER Saml. PHELPS John DRAKE George PHELPS John BISSEL Peter TILTON Joseph LOOMIS William HILL Eltwed POMEROY Elias PARKMAN Capt. John MASON Henry STILES John STRONG Nicolas PALMER Robert WATSON Thomas DEWEY Thos. BASCOMB John WHITFIELD Matthew GRANT Nathan GILLET Abraham RANDALL Thomas FORD Thomas HOLCOMB Messrs. NEWBERRY John LOOMIS James MARSHALL Wm. HOSFORD Thomas STOUGHTON Matthew ALLYN Wm. HAYDEN John HILLYER Thomas BUCKLAND Stephen TERRY Wm. HURLBERT Nicholas DENSLOW List of Freemen of Windsor, CT. Submitted by Samuel Wolcott, 1 Mar 1850 Oct 7th, 1669. Acount taken of all such persons as dwell within the limets of Windsor, and have bin approved of to be freemen, and alowed to take the oath of freedom. EGELSTON, Beagat EGELSTON, James EGELSTON, Thomas EGELSTON, Josiah Cheryl

    03/23/2005 04:20:43
    1. Bunnell, Chittenden, Ross, Whittlesey, Day, Harpending, Marsh, Moffitt, etc.
    2. Edwin and Cornelia Moore
    3. I'm researching these CT ancestors, some for me, some for Edwin. can anyone tell me where these people were born? any information appreciated. I have some descendancy, an occasional death and/or marriage date for the specific individuals, but mostly my information on the individuals listed below is spotty. I'm happy to share what I have on them and their descendants. Charles A. BUNNELL b. abt 1800 CT m. 1st Almyra GUNN, 2nd Tryphenia BABLET-researching Charles and Almyra's son Ira's descendants Azariah ROSS b. 1789-1792 CT m. Polly CHITTENDEN b. 1790-1800 of CT (MA?)- researching ancestry & descent John Hall WHITTLESEY b. 4 Jun 1778 Wallingford, CT m. Sally CHITTENDEN b. 9 Oct 1782 of CT-researching descendants _____, Catherine b. 10 Jan 1815 CT (MA?) -researching ancestry & descendancy. she m. Samuel HARPENDING b. 1810-1815 NY they resided in CT Lovila A. DAY b. 25 Jun 1803 CT-research ancestry and descendancy (son of Eliphalet and Abigail (MOFFITT) DAY) I've found alot online but Edwin's ancestor, Ezra DAY has been very elusive. we can't find his marriage in Wisconsin, or his death either in Karnes Co., TX or in Wisconsin, or anywhere in between. his wife's death eludes us as well. Abigail MOFFITT b. 17 Jun 1783 CT daughter of Enoch Moffitt and Elizabeth __?__ researching ancestry and descendancy Sally and Polly CHITTENDEN are thought to be sisters. they resided in Portage Co., OH, and when Polly died her youngest child stayed with John WHITTLESEY and his second wife in 1850-Sally having died as well. the other possibility is that she may have been his patient, as he was a doctor. I do not know of her being ill, though. thank you for your time. I hope someone can add to these lines... btw, of these couples, DAY and HARPENDING are Edwin's ancestors, the rest are mine Cornelia

    03/23/2005 03:23:47
    1. Eggleston-Palmer
    2. I am looking for the parent's of Mahala Eggleston, b. June 5, 1807, possibly Connecticut She m. Daniel Chapman Palmer, December 4, 1826, possibly Connecticut Could anyone tell me what nationality Eggleston is? Regards, Joyce

    03/23/2005 02:01:55
    1. Catherine Farrelly Lynch
    2. I am trying to trace one of my grandmother's sisters, Catherine Farrelly, who was born in Kingscourt, County Cavan, in 1879, was living with one of her siblings in Peoria, Illinois, in 1902, and married a man named Lynch (don't know first name, unfortunately) and moved to Bridgeport, Connecticut. I know she was living in Bridgeport when one sister died in 1944 and she had died by the time my grandmother died in 1957. Can anyone suggest ways I could track her down? Any advice is most welcome! Diane

    03/18/2005 10:59:19
    1. Re: Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. David Lamb
    3. Hello, I may be wrong on this, but I would think that at such an early date, the qualifications would be much the same as they were here in England - by inheriting the position from father or grandfather (in other words, by right of birth), by completing an apprenticeship (described "by right of apprenticeship"), or by payment of money. The candidate would have to sign an oath indicating his allegiance to the civil authorities of the place concerned. I know that the one for Massachusetts was as follows, and I expect the one for Connecticut would have been similar: "I, A B, etc., being, by the Almighty's most wise disposition, become a member of this body, consisting of the Governor, Deputy Governor, Assistants and a commonalty of the Mattachusets in New England, do freely and sincerely acknowledge that I am justly and lawfully subject to the government of the same, and do accordingly submit my person and estate to be protected, ordered, and governed by the laws and constitutions thereof, and do faithfully promise to be from time to time obedient and conformable thereunto, and to the authority of the said Governor and Assistants and their successors, and to all such laws, orders, sentences, and decrees as shall be lawfully made and published by them or their successors; and I will always endeavor (as in duty I am bound) to advance the peace and welfare of this body or commonwealth to my utmost skill and ability; and I will, to my best power and means, seek to divert and prevent whatsoever may tend to the ruin or damage thereof, or of any the said Governor, Deputy Governor, or Assistants, or any of them or their successors, and will give speedy notice to them, or some of them, of any sedition, violence, treachery, or other hurt or evil which I shall know, hear, or vehemently suspect to be plotted or intended against the said commonwealth, or the said government established; and I will not at any time suffer or give consent to any counsel or attempt that shall be done, given, or attempted for the impeachment of the said government, or making any change alteration of the same, contrary to the laws and ordinances thereof, but shall do my utmost endeavor to discover, oppose, and hinder all and every such counsel and attempt. So help me God." One thing to be aware of is that "Freeman" and "Freedman" have quite different meanings. (A "Freedman" is a former slave who has been granted his liberty. A Freeman is one who has been given certain rights in the place where he lives, including the right to trade, and to vote). Regards, David Lamb (Paignton, Devon, UK) Connecticut and Massachusetts (USA) interest: John TALCOTT (abt 1590 - 1659/60), his wife Dorothy MOTT (abt 1600 - 1669/70) and their descendants ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:54 PM Subject: Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"? > Could someone please explain to me the qualifications for becoming a > "freemen" in the 1600's. Age? etc. I am trying to determine if the one being > accepted in 1669 as a freemen is the father or the son. > > Thank you, > Janet > > ______________________________

    03/16/2005 01:48:57
    1. Re: [GenCT] Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. Somewhere I have the info you seek but am abt to depart for Mississippi and my minda aflutter. You should be able to do a google-search for "freemen's Oath" Basically, they had to be accepted by the community, be a member of the local church, (Congregational was the state church til abt 1803,) own a certain amount of land (I think the requirement for a batchelor was different for a family man), work the land for a certain period of time, and take the Freeman's Oath...(an oath of allegiance).. Adds new meaning to the reference to "freemen" in the US Constitution,...yes?! Shirley in San Diego -- [email protected] wrote: Thank you for your help. In a message dated 3/15/2005 2:08:31 PM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: From what my ancestral grandfather did, he didn't have money to come across to America, so he was in debt to another person, for 7 years. When he worked this time period out to the one who sponsored him, he was admitted as a freeman..My grandfather back in the 1600's, was unmarried when he came across.

    03/15/2005 05:08:55
    1. Re: [GenCT] Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. I'm no authority, but what I see the most of in a quick search is 21. There are a number of web sites which discuss various ages and other restrictions of several states through time, so put a few query terms in Google and good luck! Carol

    03/15/2005 02:48:25
    1. Re: [GenCT] Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. Thanks Carol, Thank you for the site. Do you happen to know if the voting age back then was 21 yrs. I think 21 or 22yrs was considered the legal age back then, but am not sure and can't remember where I saw it. Janet In a message dated 3/15/2005 8:21:19 PM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: See this definition at genealogy.com: http://www.genealogy.com/genealogy/Glossary/NEWGLO_F.html

    03/15/2005 02:34:05
    1. Re: [GenCT] Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. See this definition at genealogy.com: http://www.genealogy.com/genealogy/Glossary/NEWGLO_F.html Carol

    03/15/2005 02:20:49
    1. Re: [GenCT] Qualifications for becoming a "freemen"?
    2. I am not certain but I believe it was a term used to represent property owners.

    03/15/2005 12:06:58