And I'll bet you threw the wrapper away.. :-) Not too many software choices left....none that I would consider. Paul

pblair wrote: > And I'll bet you threw the wrapper away.. :-) > > Not too many software choices left....none that I would consider. One of the reasons I cling to PAF is that it's familiar. I already know what its many quirks are. I started using it as a DOS program in v 2.0; I've stuck to v5 which is current. It doesn't do a lot I'd like it to do, and it does a lot I don't need it to do, but ... the learning curve is a flat line, and in my life right now, that's a priority. (g) Better the devil you know, and all that. Cheryl