On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:48:48 -0500, singhals <singhals@erols.com> wrote: >Denis Beauregard wrote: >> Le Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:50:44 -0500, singhals<singhals@erols.com> >> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.computing: >> > >>> Legacy is a bit more complex and a lot prettier to look at. >>> It has a free version. >> >> I would prefer Legacy over PAF because PAF is outdated. The >> last release may be more than 10 years ago (or little changes >> after that). Also, you have to be sure PAF will work on Win 7 >> or 8, a problem with old softwares. > >Good grief, Denis! You'n'I are more'n 10 years old too, and >I'd sooner my family didn't abandon me for a newer edition! ;) > >Cheryl LOL... In my view the only problem with PAF is that later editions never lived up to PAF 2.3