On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:41 -0600, Charlie Hoffpauir <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>Actually in my data base the difference in name and nickname is not >>obvious. I suppose my quote marks indicate "name called" to be a >>little more precise. >> >>That may not be sufficient for purists but according to my wife I have >>some other impurities, too. So far I don't view hearing loss as a >>problem. :) >> >>Hugh >'I realize that. My reference above (Given or Nickname contains) was >only an attempt to exactly duplicate what one would see as the choice >on the RM screen. So RM at that point doesn't care if you have the >item in the name field or the nickname field... it will search for >whatever you put in the "contains" box. Roger. I deleted my last paid version of RM and I'm using the freebie 6.0. I maintain 5 DBs - 3 are to help friends. One is for me and the other can be linked by preponderance of evidence, not proof, and I have not done that yet. It would link to an early probable ancestor but be easy to unlink. I use RM to keep track of DBs other than my main one - I find it easier to switch programs than to switch within one program when looking at 2 DBs. Color me odd! Hugh