On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:43:55 -0600, Charlie Hoffpauir <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:48:48 -0500, singhals <singhals@erols.com> >wrote: > >>Denis Beauregard wrote: >>> Le Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:50:44 -0500, singhals<singhals@erols.com> >>> écrivait dans soc.genealogy.computing: >>> >> >>>> Legacy is a bit more complex and a lot prettier to look at. >>>> It has a free version. >>> >>> I would prefer Legacy over PAF because PAF is outdated. The >>> last release may be more than 10 years ago (or little changes >>> after that). Also, you have to be sure PAF will work on Win 7 >>> or 8, a problem with old softwares. >> >>Good grief, Denis! You'n'I are more'n 10 years old too, and >>I'd sooner my family didn't abandon me for a newer edition! ;) >> >>Cheryl > >LOL... In my view the only problem with PAF is that later editions >never lived up to PAF 2.3 There is that... and PAF 2.3 suffers from the Y2K bug -- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk