JD <jd4x4@<del.this>verizon.net> wrote: > There could never be total agreement on only one data model, and that's > exactly why XML could be a solution! > <snip> > > The flexible data model already exists and has for some time. What > doesn't (quite yet, but getting there) exist is the software to > manipulate it for the variety of user requirements & preferences. And, > enough users to realize that and demand it. > OK.. I apologize. I slipped into one perpetuating one of the reasons the XML issue is confusing. By flexible data model I meant the data itself, ie. people, places, events, dates. By data MODEL I meant what Cheryl was referring to, which is what combinations of data elements were ordered with what, and how much/little detail is attached to them, and who uses what, etc. Two very distinct items that often get mixed together in discussions, but both of which XML can help address individually as well as together.