On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:47:00 -0400, singhals wrote: > Now, Steve, how do I phrase this ... (g) > > Nevada has a perfectly good index to marriages. Given enough time, the > LDS volunteers will have it completely indexed. Redundant redundancy is > generally not a good use of time and resources -- unless you're stocking > the Space Station or the shuttle or keeping your escape route open. > > Cheryl Nevada's marriage index is already available on Ancestry.com. I recently found my Dad's & my step-mother's marriage in it. Todd

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:15:52 +0000 (UTC), Todd Carnes <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:47:00 -0400, singhals wrote: > >> Now, Steve, how do I phrase this ... (g) >> >> Nevada has a perfectly good index to marriages. Given enough time, the >> LDS volunteers will have it completely indexed. Redundant redundancy is >> generally not a good use of time and resources -- unless you're stocking >> the Space Station or the shuttle or keeping your escape route open. >Nevada's marriage index is already available on Ancestry.com. I recently >found my Dad's & my step-mother's marriage in it. Caveat: "On-line" sometimes means the records from blocks of years are on line, not that the entire archive is. I fairly often miss out because the marriages/births/death/etc. that I need fall in years that are not yet on Ancestry.com. Given that, the US records are still an invaluable resource for my research. Note that I'm subscribed to the US version of Ancestry--I don't know how that compares to the UK version for US record searches. -- Don [email protected]