."A.Lefevre" wrote in message news:52331e5553.A.Lefevre@freeuk.com... >From time to time I look at the Ancestry family trees, in the hope that >some >one has found some of my antecedants that I've missed. A week or so ago I >found one, so it seemed. I had a mini tree of Frederick and his wife Clara >and family, 9 Children between 1870 and 1885 but an ancestry tree had a >further child, Henrietta, born 1888 Bethnal Green. >This seemed odd, Frederick had died in 1885 and as frozen embryos were >unusual in the 1880,s, had Clara had a child after? >The Ancestry tree showed a date of birth, and address 16 Weaver St. the >same address shown on the baptism entry of Ann Elizabeth in 1885. All the >other children have baptism entries, but cannot find any entry for >Henrietta. She is not with Clara in the 1891, and doesn't show anywhere >else >Her marriage in 1908 doesn't appear in church marriages, seems to be >register office, or possibly synagogue, either is out of line with the rest >of the family. So I had a look at the house numbering of Weaver St to see >who was living at Number 16. >My conclusion is that this entry is false, but there is more than one entry >in public family trees, so some people are just copying without doing their >research. There is a birth for Henrietta Lefever Sept Qtr 1888 Bethnal Green Reg Dist Vol 1c Page 249. The name of one of the trees on Ancestry, James/Lefever family tree suggests Henrietta and her husband Walter James are the subjects of the tree, and as it has an actual date of birth and address of birth it seems that a source document has been accessed. I'm not sure how you can conclude that the information in the tree is false without checking it out. The birth certificate would do that. Andy