In message <kph8id$524$1@dont-email.me>, David Mills <dcm19401@gmailREMOVE.com> writes: >On 15/06/2013 07:48, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: >> In message <kpcurr$evq$1@dont-email.me>, David Mills >> <dcm19401@gmailREMOVE.com> writes: >>> On 13/06/2013 16:17, Tickettyboo wrote: >>>> On 2013-06-12 21:52:01 +0100, David Mills said: >> [] >>>>> His name was Thomas Aldridge, born 1853 in Braughing,Herts., living >>>>> according to the 1911 census in East Ham with his son Jesse. >> [] >>> I had bought the Fulham death certificate some while back but the >>> informant was his son A Aldridge so I ruled that one out. >> >> Are you sure he didn't have a son A.? I know there's no such living with >> him in the 1901 (see another post in this thread), but he could have >> left or not been born by then. >> [] >>> Thanks tick boo >In the 1911 census thomas states 2 children born alive and 2 living. Ah, so none _before_ Emma and Jesse. I suppose could be more later, though as mother would be 46ish by the time of the '11 (and they were both born well before the '01), you're probably right that "A." is son of another. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
On 15/06/2013 11:03, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: > In message <kph8id$524$1@dont-email.me>, David Mills > <dcm19401@gmailREMOVE.com> writes: >> On 15/06/2013 07:48, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: >>> In message <kpcurr$evq$1@dont-email.me>, David Mills >>> <dcm19401@gmailREMOVE.com> writes: >>>> On 13/06/2013 16:17, Tickettyboo wrote: >>>>> On 2013-06-12 21:52:01 +0100, David Mills said: >>> [] >>>>>> His name was Thomas Aldridge, born 1853 in Braughing,Herts., living >>>>>> according to the 1911 census in East Ham with his son Jesse. >>> [] >>>> I had bought the Fulham death certificate some while back but the >>>> informant was his son A Aldridge so I ruled that one out. >>> >>> Are you sure he didn't have a son A.? I know there's no such living with >>> him in the 1901 (see another post in this thread), but he could have >>> left or not been born by then. >>> [] >>>> Thanks tick boo >> In the 1911 census thomas states 2 children born alive and 2 living. > > Ah, so none _before_ Emma and Jesse. I suppose could be more later, > though as mother would be 46ish by the time of the '11 (and they were > both born well before the '01), you're probably right that "A." is son > of another. Very big grin. Maria died in 1910.