wrote in message news:mailman.0.1369820757.15348.genbrit@rootsweb.com... >I am drawn to the possibility that Dinah Woolley left her husband and >died >somewhere away from the area, perhaps in Scotland, Ireland or abroad. >Another >possibility is that she changed her name and remarried in another >name. As I >pointed out yesterday, the fact that Matthew Woolley said he was a >widower when >he remarried is NOT proof that he was! If his wife had gone he might >well have >thought she was dead. -- >Roy Stockdill >Genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer There's no Di* Wool(l)ey from 1863-1890 in Scotlands People deaths. Lesley Robertson

On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:34:36 +0200, "Lesley Robertson" <l.a.robertson@tnw.tudelft.nl> wrote: >wrote in message >news:mailman.0.1369820757.15348.genbrit@rootsweb.com... > >>I am drawn to the possibility that Dinah Woolley left her husband and >>died >>somewhere away from the area, perhaps in Scotland, Ireland or abroad. >>Another >>possibility is that she changed her name and remarried in another >>name. As I >>pointed out yesterday, the fact that Matthew Woolley said he was a >>widower when >>he remarried is NOT proof that he was! If his wife had gone he might >>well have >>thought she was dead. > No Di* Lenton (or Linton) either as she should also be indexed under her own surname (if known to the informant) as well as any later one.