On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 21:46 +0100, Roger Mills wrote: > Pity they didn't record the age at > death in those days! Yes they did! It just didn't start appearing in the index until 1866.
On 29/05/2013 07:48, Peter Goodey wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 21:46 +0100, Roger Mills wrote: >> Pity they didn't record the age at >> death in those days! > > Yes they did! > > It just didn't start appearing in the index until 1866. > Fair enough. But the effect is the same unless you purchase a death certificate. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked.