RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: 1939
    2. Geoff Pearson via
    3. "Peter T" wrote in message news:MPG.30a12345cc86cba89896d2@News.Individual.Net... In article <6844eb0b-bbab-4b56-a0c2-f97bece0e849@googlegroups.com>, mellychesnel@gmail.com says... > > tried my maternal grand father and he comes up in Luton with only one > other person on the record, where as there were 4 people in the > household - Mum, Dad and 2 children - so I don't think children are > recorded. I didn't pay to see the record but I 'm pretty sure it is the > right one > >I don't think children will be shown under the 100 year rule,at least that's what I'm assuming as I'm not included,born 1938 -- >Pete An uncle born in 1914 shows but not his wife born in 1915.

    11/02/2015 02:03:59