On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 7:33:20 AM UTC+1, Geoff Pearson wrote: > I've looked in the new register for my mother (b1921) and grandmother > (b1897) and not found them. I've not paid for anything yet. Anyone getting > greater success? > > Geoff tried both my parents and they don't come up either! regards melanie

On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 8:06:02 AM UTC+1, melanie chesnel wrote: > On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 7:33:20 AM UTC+1, Geoff Pearson wrote: > > I've looked in the new register for my mother (b1921) and grandmother > > (b1897) and not found them. I've not paid for anything yet. Anyone getting > > greater success? > > > > Geoff > > tried both my parents and they don't come up either! > regards melanie tried my maternal grand father and he comes up in Luton with only one other person on the record, where as there were 4 people in the household - Mum, Dad and 2 children - so I don't think children are recorded. I didn't pay to see the record but I 'm pretty sure it is the right one. However, when I try his wife in the search box she isn't there, whereas she should be the second person on the entry for her husband. My other grandfather is there in a household with one other person Ref: RG101/1989A/017/19 and his wife shows up in the search on Ref: RG101/1989A/017/20 which I presume means they are in the same household as they are consecutive reference numbers regards melanie

In article <6844eb0b-bbab-4b56-a0c2-f97bece0e849@googlegroups.com>, mellychesnel@gmail.com says... > > tried my maternal grand father and he comes up in Luton with only one other person on the record, where as there were 4 people in the household - Mum, Dad and 2 children - so I don't think children are recorded. I didn't pay to see the record but I 'm pretty sure it is the right one > I don't think children will be shown under the 100 year rule,at least that's what I'm assuming as I'm not included,born 1938 -- Pete