On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 10:03:51 AM UTC+1, Geoff Pearson wrote: > "Peter T" wrote in message > news:MPG.30a12345cc86cba89896d2@News.Individual.Net... > > In article <6844eb0b-bbab-4b56-a0c2-f97bece0e849@googlegroups.com>, > mellychesnel@gmail.com says... > > > > tried my maternal grand father and he comes up in Luton with only one > > other person on the record, where as there were 4 people in the > > household - Mum, Dad and 2 children - so I don't think children are > > recorded. I didn't pay to see the record but I 'm pretty sure it is the > > right one > > > > >I don't think children will be shown under the 100 year rule,at least > that's what I'm assuming as I'm not included,born 1938 > > -- > >Pete > > An uncle born in 1914 shows but not his wife born in 1915. Interesting - as I said on the other thread dealing with this subject, I can't see FMP making much money here, particularly if you can't get to see the details of half the household and the searchable index seems to be missing some people, particularly wives. In my case it isn't a problem, all I have to do is Skype my mum or dad and they can give me the details, they were after all there. There is no reason for me to pay to see either of my grandparents' households. I haven't checked any of my great grand parents alive in 1939, only 3 out of the 4 housholds. What info is on the register that I am unlikely to have already from the 1911 census? As Ticketyboo points out below you get to see the neighbors so the info will be useful to historians researching local history rather than geneology. regards melanie