On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:42:45 +0800, "B Pozzi" <bbpozzi@tadaust.org.au> wrote: >I am currently using the old Family Tree Maker Version 11. >Almost two years ago I purchased and installed Family Tree Maker 2008, but >it performance was so inadequate that I reverted back to using Version 11 >and am still using it. >Family Tree Maker 2010 is now on the market and I was wondering if anyone >has any experience with it and would care to comment on it compared with the >old Version 11. >Thanks >Bob I stuck with FTM 2006 after my bad experience with 2008. I have recently installed 2010, and while I prefer the 2006 interface, 2010 does have really great new features. Regards Doug

The Old Bloke wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:42:45 +0800, "B Pozzi" <bbpozzi@tadaust.org.au> > wrote: > >> I am currently using the old Family Tree Maker Version 11. >> Almost two years ago I purchased and installed Family Tree Maker 2008, but >> it performance was so inadequate that I reverted back to using Version 11 >> and am still using it. >> Family Tree Maker 2010 is now on the market and I was wondering if anyone >> has any experience with it and would care to comment on it compared with the >> old Version 11. >> Thanks >> Bob > I stuck with FTM 2006 after my bad experience with 2008. I have > recently installed 2010, and while I prefer the 2006 interface, 2010 > does have really great new features. > > Regards > Doug I have found 2010 to be really good. I upgraded from the dismal 2008 to 2009 last year and have now upgraded to 2010. I don't print many reports and I wonder why the printing of reports is so important. Who do you give all these reports to? I like FTM 2010 because of all the information that I can store and have easy access to. I probably could have done the same on 2009 but my other half is a computer nerd so we usually get most updates when they become available. Julie