"family gilbert" <jgil6052@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:mailman.9.1386462047.3398.genanz@rootsweb.com... HI Trying to locate a P Cory/ Corey . This P Cory l would assume would be Ethel Cory's husband???????????? P Cory and Ethel Cory come up in my ancestors War Records as being the mother of my ancestor. I have on address in 1943 for Bendigo and 1 address in 1945 for Shepparton then Preston. Is it possible that this name could have been used as the soldier was under age. I have searched and am unable to find any Cory marrying between 1929 and 1945. Any suggestions please Hi Jen Yes would help if you were more precise .......name of ancestor in some war record/ which war ? Who is Ethel CORY ? CORY /COREY marriage in which State ? Bye -- MargM Beautiful NSW Central Coast

Hi Raewyn How did you go with your search? That Grace Roberts Prisk tucked away in there is my 1C4R, sadly I don't have any information on them to help you. Just thought I would say Hi! And, just in case a family connection stumbles on this post, Grace Roberts Prisk's grandmother Mary Andrew has the mtDNA of T1a1. If you're a Prisk or Mundy relative feel free to contact me to compare DNA. Rhonda On Thursday, April 7, 2011 7:24:57 AM UTC+10, rbe...@ihug.co.nz wrote: > Good morning, I am new to this list. I am researching the family of > Jacob Henry Rogers.....(he was a cousin to my 2X gt grandfather John > Rogers). Jacob Henry was born abt 1846 and baptised 29 Mar 1846 Crowan, > Cornwall s/o Solomon Rogers and Mary Sincock. He married Grace Roberts > PRISK on 18 Jan 1866 in Sithney, Cornwall. They had a daughter Sarah Jane > bn abt 1870 who died in 1871. In 1872 the couple immigrated to New Zealand > on the Pleiades to Canterbury. Another nine children were born to them in > New Zealand: Henry Edward Rogers bn 1875 d 1906 Hawthorn, Victoria, > Australia a 31 yrs William John Moyle Rogers bn 1876 d 1903 Hawthorn, > Victoria, Australia a 26 yrs Jacob Francis Rogers bn 1878 d 1961 Kew, > Victoria, Australia a 83 yrs Susan Estella Roberts Rogers bn 1879 died 1884 > NZ Mary Charlotte Rogers bn 1880 died 1901 Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia a > 21 yrs Thomas Prisk Rogers bn 1882 d 1972 Brighton, Victoria, Australia a > 90 yrs Joseph Prisk Rogers bn 1883 Estella May Rogers bn 1884 d 1884 NZ > aged 9 wks Lilly Rogers bn 1888 Lilly (or Lily) Rogers married Horace > Hobart Henschel PARKER in 1908. He was born in New Zealand as well to > Frederick William PARKER and his wife Elizabeth Sarah (maiden name unknown) > Jacob Francis was also married in 1908 to Jane Hunt STEVENS The family had > moved to Victoria sometime between the birth of Lilly in 1888 and her > marriage in 1908. Jacob Henry and Grace Roberts Rogers also died in > Victoria but when I do not know. Is anyone on the list researching this > family or parts of it? What cemeteries would the above likely be buried in? > Regards, Raewyn New Zealand

HI Trying to locate a P Cory/ Corey . This P Cory l would assume would be Ethel Cory's husband???????????? P Cory and Ethel Cory come up in my ancestors War Records as being the mother of my ancestor. I have on address in 1943 for Bendigo and 1 address in 1945 for Shepparton then Preston. Is it possible that this name could have been used as the soldier was under age. I have searched and am unable to find any Cory marrying between 1929 and 1945. Any suggestions please Thank You jen

Thank you to Kate for her help Philomena From: Phil Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 12:05 PM To: GENANZ@rootsweb.com Subject: Question re Windows live mail I realize this is an odd request but could someone please help me? How do I delete names from my address book ? Thank you Philomena

On 05/12/2013 15:12, Di Allen wrote: > Peter I saw your referene also to W.A and dates to 1919, and had a similar quest, quite a coincidence in fact,social conditions in W.A at that time -during the rush for gold-meant that some men lacking a social conscience just moved on..some from UK and elsewhere had already escaped social conditions at home...see http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/seminars/finlay.html.Table 2 on that site lists dates Divorce law requirements for Aust.States - it wasnt easy, especially for women! -we followed the English model of course, and the 'Parliamentary Divorce' was the term used for terminating marriage after 7 years of no contact -presuming death. But bigamy was common, I searched through Trove.com for our ancester but finally found a W.A remarriage of his deserted wife 30 yrs later, the certificate stating she had complied with the Marriage Act -husband presumed deceased (though he was not, and had married twice more).PS Your ancestor wasn't Smith I don't suppose? > No - sorry. I am not giving the name as there are living people I don't know not far removed from the subject.

"Phil" wrote in message news:mailman.1.1386291953.1243.genanz@rootsweb.com... I realize this is an odd request but could someone please help me? How do I delete names from my address book ? Thank you Philomena Hi Philomena Open your Contacts, "Right" Click on the appropriate person and click Delete. Regards, Kate Sydney, Australia

I realize this is an odd request but could someone please help me? How do I delete names from my address book ? Thank you Philomena

On Friday, 2 March 2001 22:30:10 UTC+13, Lyn Cormick wrote: > John and Sarah arrived on the" Atrato" on the 10th February 1874 to > Canterbury NZ > Children > Rose 1862,Annie1863,George Henry 1865,Alice1868,William > 1869,Florence1871,Albert1874,Ada 1875 > Would love to hear from any one who may have interest in this family. > Stanbrooks@apex.net.au > -- > Lyn Cormick > cormick@apex.net.au I have an interest in this family. Will email.

On Monday, July 28, 2003 12:07:10 PM UTC+10, RR wrote: > I am looking for info on the passengers arriving on the ship "York" > It arrived 13 November 1825 to Sydney. > I was told it was "the first ship organised by the Australian Agricultural > Company to bring immigrants to NSW" > > James Alexander CARTER, wife ? Elizabeth, and a female child departed > from England but unfortunately James drowned on way out. > Any help appreciated > Please reply on newsgroup. > Thanks > Roma in NZ Hi Roma, It's been a while since you posted but.......I am a descendant of James Carter through his daughter Priscilla (mother Elizabeth Deathe). I do have a little more info, if you have not uncovered it, and would love to share info if you wish. Cheers Julie

On Monday, July 28, 2003 12:07:10 PM UTC+10, RR wrote: > I am looking for info on the passengers arriving on the ship "York" > It arrived 13 November 1825 to Sydney. > I was told it was "the first ship organised by the Australian Agricultural > Company to bring immigrants to NSW" > > James Alexander CARTER, wife ? Elizabeth, and a female child departed > from England but unfortunately James drowned on way out. > Any help appreciated > Please reply on newsgroup. > Thanks > Roma in NZ

On Friday, 6 December 2013 02:12:49 UTC+11, Di Allen wrote: > On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 00:15:48 UTC+11, Peter J. Seymour wrote: > > > This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular > > > > > > instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western > > > > > > Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the > > > > > > documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year > > > > > > rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before > > > > > > remarrying. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce > > > > > > or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could > > > > > > anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard > > > > > > practice" at the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Peter I saw your referene also to W.A and dates to 1919, and had a similar quest, quite a coincidence in fact,social conditions in W.A at that time -during the rush for gold-meant that some men lacking a social conscience just moved on..some from UK and elsewhere had already escaped social conditions at home...see http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/seminars/finlay.html.Table 2 on that site lists dates Divorce law requirements for Aust.States - it wasnt easy, especially for women! -we followed the English model of course, and the 'Parliamentary Divorce' was the term used for terminating marriage after 7 years of no contact -presuming death. But bigamy was common, I searched through Trove.com for our ancester but finally found a W.A remarriage of his deserted wife 30 yrs later, the certificate stating she had complied with the Marriage Act -husband presumed deceased (though he was not, and had married twice more).PS Your ancestor wasn't Smith I don't suppose? Sorry bout that link, http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/seminars/finlay.html is the correct one.

On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 00:15:48 UTC+11, Peter J. Seymour wrote: > This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular > > instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western > > Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the > > documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year > > rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before > > remarrying. > > > > Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce > > or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could > > anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard > > practice" at the time. > > > > Thanks. Peter I saw your referene also to W.A and dates to 1919, and had a similar quest, quite a coincidence in fact,social conditions in W.A at that time -during the rush for gold-meant that some men lacking a social conscience just moved on..some from UK and elsewhere had already escaped social conditions at home...see http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/seminars/finlay.html.Table 2 on that site lists dates Divorce law requirements for Aust.States - it wasnt easy, especially for women! -we followed the English model of course, and the 'Parliamentary Divorce' was the term used for terminating marriage after 7 years of no contact -presuming death. But bigamy was common, I searched through Trove.com for our ancester but finally found a W.A remarriage of his deserted wife 30 yrs later, the certificate stating she had complied with the Marriage Act -husband presumed deceased (though he was not, and had married twice more).PS Your ancestor wasn't Smith I don't suppose?

On Thursday, July 20, 2000 5:00:00 PM UTC+10, Michele Deering wrote: > Hi > > Just posting some spares. Please contact me off list for details. > > Deaths in District of Stawell 1895 > > John Patrick Murphy father Jno Patk Murphy > mother UK > Annie Dalziel ? John Given Dalziel? > Annie Amelia Dalziel / Chalk > Catherine Milner Charles Milner > Bridget Milner / Dwyer > Mary Ann Lewis William Lewis > Mary Lewis / Lewis > Annie Mary Perkin ? Gluyas ? > Jane Gluyas / Bosanko > > Stawell 1922 Deaths > > David Rossen? Brynon David Brynon > Ann Brynon / Saundrss? > Jane Ingram John Patten > UK > Geoffrey Albert Cole Percy Victor Coles > Edith Maud Cole / Baldwin > Ronald Gray Hemley William Oliver Hemley > Isabell Hemley / Joiner > Mary Ann Murphy Uk O'Hare > Uk > > Deaths in District of Cheltenham 1920 > > Jane Walker John Walker > Margt Walker / Stockman > Caroline Kelly Peter Reid > Caroline Reid / Uk > Frank Culhane John Culhane > Sarah Culhane / Ruttle > Samuel James Pattinson Richard Pattinson > Frances Jane Pattinson / Pierce? > James Thomson Walter Thomson > Janet Thomson / Darling? > > Regards > Michele Hello, I know this is a very old entry wondering if u have further info on Deaths in District of Ballarat 1912 Harriet Hauser Joseph Truscott Mary Truscott / Uk Cheers, Fran

"Peter J. Seymour" <ng@pjsey.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:vK%mu.62$EM4.41@fx19.fr7... > This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a > particular instance where a migrant having married in the UK > and again in Western Australia when the first wife was still > living is clearly evident in the documentation available today. > It is nothing to do with a seven year rule as the person was > only in Australia for about one year before remarrying. > > Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of > documented divorce or "setting-aside" of marriage that might > apply? Additionally, could anyone comment on whether this could > have been considered "standard practice" at the time. Hi Peter Before 1974 divorce was quite an expensive undertaking here . You had to prove fault Possibly the party in your example thought they could get away with it due to distance . Haven't really come across any such 'standard practice' considerations Unsure of earlier divorce records for WA .Ask Mr Google Bye -- MargM Beautiful NSW Central Coast

"Peter J. Seymour" wrote in message news:zI%mu.183$RS6.159@fx23.fr7... This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before remarrying. Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard practice" at the time. Thanks. PS Should have explained State Records WA http://www.sro.wa.gov.au/ give reference to this site for search. Kate

"Peter J. Seymour" wrote in message news:zI%mu.183$RS6.159@fx23.fr7... This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before remarrying. Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard practice" at the time. Thanks. Hi Peter If you try the following site you might find some reference to a Divorce/Separation in WA http://aeon.sro.wa.gov.au/investigator/investigator.htm I know from reading old British Newspapers online that during the 19th century Bigamy was practically a national sport so no reason why it should not have continued into the 20th C. Hope you find something on the above site and perhaps, if you wish, you could give the names of those involved with the hope of getting additional help. Regards, Kate Sydney, Australia

On 02/12/2013 13:13, Peter J. Seymour wrote: > This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular > instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western > Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the > documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year > rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before > remarrying. > > Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce > or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could > anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard > practice" at the time. > > Thanks. Apologies - I missed out any dates. The whole story (parts of which are not relevant here) plays out over 1913-1919.

This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before remarrying. Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard practice" at the time. Thanks.

This is possibly a well-known subject. I am puzzled by a particular instance where a migrant having married in the UK and again in Western Australia when the first wife was still living is clearly evident in the documentation available today. It is nothing to do with a seven year rule as the person was only in Australia for about one year before remarrying. Can anyone help with suggestions for possibilities of documented divorce or "setting-aside" of marriage that might apply? Additionally, could anyone comment on whether this could have been considered "standard practice" at the time. Thanks.

In 1909 the small country town of Woolabra changed its name to Belatta, it's located in north west NSW. There is still properties called Greentrees in the area and they are still farming. Good luck :)