Transcribed by Ann Selchick. Geo. THE CARLISLE PATRIOT, MAY 27th, 1865 COURTS. - SATURDAY _____ (Before W. WORDSWORTH, Esq. (in the chair), Major FAIRTLOUGH, Jas. WALKER, Esq., and R. GRAHAM, Esq.) A disreputable character, who said that his name was ROSS, and his speech betrayed him to be a Scotchman, was charged by the chief constable with drunken and disorderly conduct, to the great scandal of the pedestrians on the Warwick Road, on Wednesday evening. Several women were afraid to go along the road in the vicinity of the brute, who was in a state of intoxication, and made use of the foulest language to every one who came near him. At one time a railway porter interposed, and excited his ire by his attempting to prevent the man’s annoying the females; and when Chief Constable came up, he told the man not to make a disturbance; but this reprimand seemed to be means of eliciting a fresh outburst of cursing and swearing, and brutal language. The Chief Constable, walking with a gentleman and lady whom he had overtaken, did not wish to have a scene, and quietly went on till the opportunity arose of acting as he felt. The bully, thinking no doubt that he had overawed the party, kept at no great distance from their heels, but too far off to be conveniently kicked, and continued his abuse for about a mile, giving the passers-by a specimen of his quality. But on reaching a certain point, to his astonishment and disgust, the bright buttons of the constable glistened ominously in his eyes, and the next moment he found himself in durance intensely “vile” with his own companionship. All the time the charge was being heard, the prisoner pleaded hard to be let off - for he had been “drinking several days and did not know what he had been doing.” He was in the Edinburgh Militia, and had the post of door-keeper to fill in a few days’ time. The prisoner had on his drunken walk anathematized the “Queen’s shilling” like a renegade, and was especially bitter against the something Englishmen. The bench sentenced him to seven days’ imprisonment. - The rest of the cases were of such a character as to justify the recent moral philippic of Mr. PERCIVAL. *****