On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 3:10:52 PM UTC-7, wjhonson wrote: > You're being hyperbolic which utterly destroys your argument. > And finally we cannot even know if any of these alledged descendants are > true biological heirs without (and let me pause here for emphasis) having > their AUTOSOMAL DNA tests on file and vetted. > > Without all of that, you have exactly squat. And now who is being hyperbolic? If a Cornwall and a Warren were both found matching Richard's specific G haplotype, it would strain credulity to suggest that all three resulted from a crypto-infidelity perpetrated by members of the same male lineage, that it was all just coincidence. taf