On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:12:09 PM UTC+2, wjhonson wrote: > However a lower proportion, multiplied by a broader base, means the same proportion or perhaps even more. > No, the autosomal testing available now is not full sequencing. It is looking at specific known and common mutation points, and then identifying big clumps of DNA that seem to be moving together from generation to generation. No big clumps because too many generations, no ID possible.

On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 2:57:03 PM UTC-7, Andrew Lancaster wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:12:09 PM UTC+2, wjhonson wrote: > > > However a lower proportion, multiplied by a broader base, means the same proportion or perhaps even more. > > > > No, the autosomal testing available now is not full sequencing. It is looking at specific known and common mutation points, and then identifying big clumps of DNA that seem to be moving together from generation to generation. No big clumps because too many generations, no ID possible. Nothing I said implies that it is full sequencing. Nothing in my idea requires full sequencing.