From: Douglas Richardson <royalancestry@msn.com> Sent: 02 September 2017 01:41 <snip> > Mr. Denholm-Young gives the following documentation for this pedigree: > > "This portion of the Delaware tree, not known to Farrer (Fees, iii. 354), is derived from A.R. 233, m. 6d. In the case there found against John and Olimpia his wife (in 1256) for land of her inheritance, as she asserted, in Leaden Roding, of the Warenne fee in Essex, this pedigree was produced." END OF QUOTE. > > We see that Complete Peerage cited as its source, Assize Roll, no 237, m. 6 or 7, whereas Denholm-Young has cited Assize Roll 233, m. 6d. Which is correct? > > So far I haven't been able to find either of the Assize documents, but it would seem that Denholm-Young is more likely correct as he appear to quote the exact pedigree found in his document. ... <snip> Here it is, Douglas: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/JUST1/JUST1no233/bJUST1no233dorses/IMG_7066.htm Matt Tompkins