On Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 7:45:16 AM UTC-6, wbld....@gmail.com wrote: < The evidence I posted earlier supports Davis’ conclusion. < < William Acton Dear William ~ Mr. Davis has alleged that "Pierre Bruse" of Hochampe named in the 1620 Visitation of Shropshire is the same person as the well known Sir Peter de Brewes, of Tetbury, Gloucestershire, who died in 1312. However, his paper lacks the simple evidence to prove either this idea or even that alleged "Pierre Bruse" had the three daughters and co-heirs named in the Visitation. Mr. Davis has put forward a working theory that is all, not a conclusion. As far as working theories go, I believe it is flawed. As I stated in my earlier message, the 1620 Visitation of Shropshire is not the most reliable visitation. I would urge you to verify everything that you find in that visitation. Mr. Davis has shown that the Saint Owen family were tenants of the senior Brewes family. That, however, does not prove the existence of "Pierre Bruse" of Hochampe, or that Alice, wife of Ralph de Saint Owen, was his daughter. One other thing: In this time period, the surname is spelled Brewes, Breuse, Brehuse, Breouse, Breus, but not Braose. Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah