On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 2:38:33 PM UTC-7, Thomas Milton Tinney, Sr. wrote: > TAF, you are HALF-way home. DNA does not support EITHER one. Yes, it does > not support my philosophy, NOR does it support evolution. This is not the place to discuss either of these, but only the first half of your concluding statement is accurate. The second part is blatant denialism - 'I don't want it to be true so it isn't'. > CONCLUSION. There is more scientific reliability in weather forecasting, > than various comic DNA fantasy projections. Again, simply wrong, see above. There is no arguing with denialism because it is either not based on evidence, or every piece of evidence is distorted and misrepresented to conform with the predetermined conclusion. All one can do is call it what it is so others are not misled, and move on. This is me moving on. taf