On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 7:01:00 AM UTC-7, Paulo Canedo wrote: > I was wrong, the genealogist who uses the connection Millicent de Rethel > -William de Camville isn´t Ed Mann it is Leo Van de Pas. Not as I am reading it - he shows William de Camville as son of RIchard de Camville, but by Adelicia and not by Milicent, and it looks like it has been that way since 2003 at least. taf
Em quinta-feira, 7 de julho de 2016 16:19:39 UTC+1, taf escreveu: > On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 7:01:00 AM UTC-7, Paulo Canedo wrote: > > > I was wrong, the genealogist who uses the connection Millicent de Rethel > > -William de Camville isn´t Ed Mann it is Leo Van de Pas. > > Not as I am reading it - he shows William de Camville as son of RIchard de Camville, but by Adelicia and not by Milicent, and it looks like it has been that way since 2003 at least. > > taf Well so the note in which he used it is probably of before 2003.