RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 5/5
    1. Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.
    2. Marged
    3. I went off them all after the way they treated Diana. She needed guidance from a firm mother-in-law (or mother) but it was not given. What finished me off was the scene at Balmoral on the Sunday when I first heard Diana was dead - when the clergyman at the Church they had all been at stated "We did not mention her by name, but we said prayers for the dead". Diana's sons were there in that Church, and their mother's name SHOULD have been mentioned. And then all that stuff about no flag flying at Buckingham Palace etc. Ok, they put it right when the People showed they would not put up with it, but for me, it was too late. Marj > Glad to hear it, I think the good ole UK would be a sadder place without all > the pageantry, opening of parliament, trooping of the colours - just think > what dollar earners our Royals are. > As for a job for life, well if we had a president then s/he would have a > pension for life - and don't tell me they don't have their hangers on - I > know the do. > Our royals just do it with a bit more style. > Bubbles from Robin Hood Country. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/02

    01/29/2002 11:26:13
    1. Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.
    2. Brian
    3. Thank God someone has finally shown them for the hypocrites they are. I AGREE!!!!!!!!! They should be totally ashamed, but then. when have royalty ever been ashamed? Brian List Admin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marged" <marged@btinternet.com> To: <GEN-FRIENDS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George. > I went off them all after the way they treated Diana. She needed guidance > from a firm mother-in-law (or mother) but it was not given. > > What finished me off was the scene at Balmoral on the Sunday when I first > heard Diana was dead - when the clergyman at the Church they had all been at > stated "We did not mention her by name, but we said prayers for the dead". > > Diana's sons were there in that Church, and their mother's name SHOULD have > been mentioned. > > And then all that stuff about no flag flying at Buckingham Palace etc. > > Ok, they put it right when the People showed they would not put up with it, > but for me, it was too late. > > Marj > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/2002

    01/29/2002 11:36:25
    1. Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.
    2. Bubbles
    3. I do go along with you there Marg, but I think Liz had to eat humble pie. I'm not so sure about a strong mother in law, I reckon a faithfully husband would not have gone amiss. Bubbles from Robin Hood Country. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marged" <marged@btinternet.com> To: <GEN-FRIENDS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.

    01/29/2002 12:59:01
    1. Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.
    2. Marged
    3. If Charles had married a Royal Princess he would have got a wife who expected him to be unfaithful. Instead, he married a girl who was described as a "Commoner", and who soon learned to play him at his own game. Recent revelations about the length of time he had been involved with Mrs Parker Bowles make me disgusted with him, and her as well. They both used their partners to their own ends. Marj > I do go along with you there Marg, but I think Liz had to eat humble pie. > I'm not so sure about a strong mother in law, I reckon a faithfully husband > would not have gone amiss. > Bubbles from Robin Hood Country. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/02

    01/29/2002 12:58:24
    1. Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George.
    2. Jim SHARPE
    3. No Royal child gets proper parental guidance because of the remoteness between parents and children inherent in the upper class system of education. Jim Sharpe Shaw, Oldham. ----- Original Message ----- From: Marged <marged@btinternet.com> To: <GEN-FRIENDS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:26 PM Subject: Re: [GEN-FRIENDS] England and St George. > I went off them all after the way they treated Diana. She needed guidance > from a firm mother-in-law (or mother) but it was not given. > > What finished me off was the scene at Balmoral on the Sunday when I first > heard Diana was dead - when the clergyman at the Church they had all been at > stated "We did not mention her by name, but we said prayers for the dead". > > Diana's sons were there in that Church, and their mother's name SHOULD have > been mentioned. > > And then all that stuff about no flag flying at Buckingham Palace etc. > > Ok, they put it right when the People showed they would not put up with it, > but for me, it was too late. > > Marj > > > > > Glad to hear it, I think the good ole UK would be a sadder place without > all > > the pageantry, opening of parliament, trooping of the colours - just think > > what dollar earners our Royals are. > > As for a job for life, well if we had a president then s/he would have a > > pension for life - and don't tell me they don't have their hangers on - I > > know the do. > > Our royals just do it with a bit more style. > > Bubbles from Robin Hood Country. > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 28/01/02 > > > ==== GEN-FRIENDS Mailing List ==== > Suspect virus messages should be sent to the List Admin only, > NOT to the list, so they can be checked out before a panic starts. > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >

    01/30/2002 04:52:15