>To: [email protected] >From: Carole Johnson <[email protected]> >Subject: Charles Garner > >Hi, Cathy! >I was so happy to see your post to Polk County today! I just realized >that I have left out the "1" in my address to you and that is why >you haven't received my posts. Instead of the posts being returned >with an address flaw, they were held for several days before saying >that they were not received, which led me to think you'd gone off-line >or changed addresses. Anyway, I now know the mistake was mine. As >for the cemetary books (there are two) I don't know if they are available >for sale. I need to go to Marietta next week and would be more than >happy to look up anyone for you, but I know sometimes it is nice to >have a book on hand. I'll see what I can find out. Also, have you >had any contact with Howard (Bo) Griffin? He just sent me via >snail mail a tree with our kin back to 1580. Bo's wife is the >granddaughter of Alonzo Payne Garner (my gmother's brother) son >of William T. Garner. It doesn't list sources, but it is complete >with ancestors of Samuel Garner. I'd be happy to send you a copy. >I'm so glad for your post! >Thanks, >Carole > > > > >Dear Cathy! >I sent this message originally on the 6th literally as I was >walking out the door. I found on my return that it wasn't >delivered. I'm sure you wondered what happened. I got your >posts about the new source. Keep me posted >Thanks! >Carole > > >Hey, Cathy! > >Don't despair about the marriage info regarding Katherine and Joe >Pruitt. That was information from the LDS library. They listed >Sarah being married to John Ezzell when the census state Lewis. >That would be a difficult misspelling, don't ya think? The census >taker certainly could be missinformed, but it is a viable record, >not just someone's memory. When I return from my trip, I'll >try checking the census's again for Katherine and Pleasant. >I appreciate these leads... you never know where they'll take >you. > >I'll return on the fifteenth. > >Hope to hear from you then! >Carole