RootsWeb Mailing List Archives

RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists

Home

Results for list 'gamorgan'

Sender

Subject

Content

Total: 1/1

1. [GAMORGAN-L] Fwd: Clarke County Marriage Record
3. --part1_ad.3207ea62.2c710694_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_ad.3207ea62.2c710694_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <nontext-reject@lists5.rootsweb.com> Received: from rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (rly-xn04.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.137]) by air-xn04.mail.aol.com (v95.12) with ESMTP id MAILINXN44-6463f3fabff364; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:23:59 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [207.40.200.41]) by rly-xn04.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXN46-6463f3fabff364; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:23:28 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7HGNL1b032004; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 10:23:21 -0600 Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 10:23:21 -0600 Message-Id: <200308171623.h7HGNL1b032004@lists5.rootsweb.com> To: AltaMDurden@aol.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Clarke County Marriage Record References: <11b.26cde03a.2c7105f4@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <11b.26cde03a.2c7105f4@aol.com> From: MORGAN-L-request@rootsweb.com X-Mailer: Procmail Autoreply X-Loop: MORGAN-L-request@rootsweb.com X-AOL-IP: 207.40.200.41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > --part1_11b.26cde03a.2c7105f4_boundary > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > --part1_11b.26cde03a.2c7105f4_boundary > Content-Type: message/rfc822 > Content-Disposition: inline > Return-path: <AltaMDurden@aol.com> > From: AltaMDurden@aol.com > Full-name: AltaMDurden > Message-ID: <5a.20a3a0ab.2c710589@aol.com> > Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:21:29 EDT > Subject: Re: Clarke County Marriage Record > To: varcsix@hot.rr.com > CC: seales_family@email.msn.com > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_11b.26cde03a.2c710589_boundary" > X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6014 > --part2_11b.26cde03a.2c710589_boundary > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > In a message dated 8/17/2003 11:43:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, > varcsix@hot.rr.com writes: > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/ga/talbot/vitals.html > > > > Sorry it took me so long... I was on vacation. Well deserved, I know. > > Glad you're back home safely. Try writing to the > > GACLARKE-L list also --- in case anyone there can help you. At that time > > period there are usually just entries in a log book.....not an actual > > certificate. This man and his family lived for a time in Morgan County, > > Georgia and he owned land which he sold to an in-law of his brother, Murrell > > Mitchem, 1815-1855, who died in that county and is buried at Madison, Georgia. > > Nathaniel J. Mitchum went to Shelby County, Alabama and appears on the > > censuses there in 1860, 1870, and 1880; however, it is clear from those censuses > > that at least two of his children were born in Georgia around the beginning of > > the 1850's, and we could never understand why we could not find him in > > Georgia on the 1850 census. Last night that mystery was solved when I found a list > > of slaveowners in COBB County, Georgia in 1850, which was recorded between > > July and December of 1850. There was a notation accompanying this list to the > > effect that those slaveowners had been omitted from the regular census. On > > that list, his name was spelled "MitchAm". In MORGAN County it was spelled > > the same as his brother: "MitchEm", but in Alabama it is consistently > > "MitchUm". > I will forward this to COBB, CLARKE, and MORGAN Counties, as well as to > the SHELBY County, Alabama, folks. > Again, thank you for all your help and your constancy at research. I > really appreciate it. Alta Mitchem Durden > > > > > > At 08:27 PM 8/11/2003 -0400, you wrote: > > >Virginia: > > > > > >I have seen online (FHC) record of marriage of Nathaniel J. Mitchum and > > >Eudocia Hubbard in Clarke County on April 14, 1836, but can find no > > >documentation or further information. Could you please tell me from whom > > >I might get an official copy of this document ... to be sure it really > > >exists! Thank you. > > >Alta Mitchem Durden - P. S. This marriage record is #2063 for Clarke > > >County in the FHC records, if that helps you any at all. > > > > Virginia Crilley > > > > > > > --part2_11b.26cde03a.2c710589_boundary > Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > <HTML> =3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">In a message dated 8/17/2003 11:43:27 AM Eastern Stand= > ard Time, varcsix@hot.rr.com writes: > > <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT= > : 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenw= > eb/ga/talbot/vitals.html > > Sorry it took me so long... I was on vacation. ff0000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FA= > CE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> Well deserved, I know. Glad you're b= > ack home safely. UND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">= > Try writing to the > GACLARKE-L list also --- in case anyone there can help you. At that ti= > me > period there are usually just entries in a log book.....not an actual > certificate. ff" SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> This m= > an and his family lived for a time in Morgan County, Georgia and he owned la= > nd which he sold to an in-law of his brother, Murrell Mitchem, 1815-1855, wh= > o died in that county and is buried at Madison, Georgia. Nathaniel J.=20= > Mitchum went to Shelby County, Alabama and appears on the censuses there in=20= > 1860, 1870, and 1880; however, it is clear from those censuses that at least= > two of his children were born in Georgia around the beginning of the 1850's= > , and we could never understand why we could not find him in Georgia on the=20= > 1850 census. Last night that mystery was solved when I found a list of= > slaveowners in COBB County, Georgia in 1850, which was recorded between Jul= > y and December of 1850. There was a notation accompanying this list to= > the effect that those slaveowners had been omitted from the regular census.= > On that list, his name was spelled "MitchAm". In MORGAN County=20= > it was spelled the same as his brother: "MitchEm", but in Alabama it is cons= > istently "MitchUm". </BLOCKQUOTE> OR=3D"#ff0000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSE= > RIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> > I will forward this to COBB, CLARKE, and MORGAN Counti= > es, as well as to the SHELBY County, Alabama, folks. > Again, thank you for all your help and your constancy at=20= > research. I really appreciate it. Alta Mitchem Durden > > FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> > <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT= > : 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"> style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"A= > rial" LANG=3D"0"> > > At 08:27 PM 8/11/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >Virginia: > > > >I have seen online (FHC) record of marriage of Nathaniel J. Mitchum and=20= > > >Eudocia Hubbard in Clarke County on April 14, 1836, but can find no > >documentation or further information. Could you please tell me fro= > m whom > >I might get an official copy of this document ... to be sure it really <= > BR> > >exists! Thank you. > >Alta Mitchem Durden - P. S. This marriage record is #2063 for Clar= > ke > >County in the FHC records, if that helps you any at all. > > Virginia Crilley > > > </BLOCKQUOTE> > > </HTML> > --part2_11b.26cde03a.2c710589_boundary-- > --part1_11b.26cde03a.2c7105f4_boundary-- Hi -- The message you submitted to this list (included above) wasn't sent to the list subscribers. RootsWeb accepts only plain text mail. That means that HTML mail, attachments, ``enriched text'', and a few other formats can't be sent to RootsWeb mailing lists. You can post your message if you send it in plain text; turn off the ``Post in HTML'' or ``Enriched Text'' features of your mail reader, or don't use any attachments. See http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/listadmins/plaintext.html for instructions on turning off HTML in most of the popular mail programs, or ask your ISP's technical support line for help. We've had to institute this policy because of the problems that accompany these fancy mail formats. Some people don't have mail programs that are capable of processing the special file formats. Even among those who do, different mail programs handle these special formats in very different and confusing ways. HTML messages pose special problems to our digested mailing lists. Most of all, HTML-ified mail and attachments place a considerable burden on RootsWeb's overworked machines. All in all, mail in this format produces a lot of problems for RootsWeb's servers and subscribers, so we find it's best just to use plain text. -- The RootsWeb staff --part1_ad.3207ea62.2c710694_boundary--
08/17/2003 06:25:56