> I gather you are speaking of the Jackson County CC that resigned > 12/27? This person was put in place by the former RC for the > Northeast Region - Mr. Giddeon. All the while he was RC - > he did her pages, told her she had no need for the password > for the account since she couldn't do webpages and wouldn't > know how to begin. She did no work other than transcriptions > which the RC placed online for her as well. No work other than transcriptions... ow my... what a crime... possibly the biggest benefit to the users there is. I'm sorry, this doesn't wash for me, nor do I think this CC with the work they did dedicate was treated fairly. I also find this seriously trivializes what that CC did do for GAGenWeb. You of course are entitled to disagree. > >I am NOT a malcontent. > > > >I am opposed to abuse of power and removal of volunteers before they > >have an opportunity themselves to this process of defense, that you > >claim is denied to Tim. Hypocrisy is the greatest crime, you want > >afforded to Tim, what he did not give to the CCs he removed. > >Removal, like you and others claim for him, should be the last > >resort, you have not proven that it was the last resort afforded > >those Dismissed from GA. > > Try as I might you've lost me in your last paragraph for your terms > seem to turn on themselves so that what point you were trying to make > got lost. CCs are Removed and then need to Appeal their Removal. You have fought your Removal based on no defense and not following Procedures. I find the 2 to be seriously at conflict and unfair. Why is it OK that CCs need to fight to be re-instated, yet Leadership wants the right to defence before being Removed. > Suffice it to say that dismissed CCs (2) had rights under our > Guidelines to appeal to the Council but chose not to. They went to > National who wasted 2 months of my time to basically say nothing > happened. Then we have another complaint signed by more 'new' led > down the primrose path CCs with encouragement from some from the > National scence. And so we have arrived here. Again, I must take offense. I have not been led down any primrose path. I am my own man. I am not a Malcontent. Am I not allowed to have an opinion? How long must I wait, 2 months, 6 months, 6 years? I'm sorry I didn't see that laid out in any guidelines. Although I am new perhaps to GA, I contend I am more aware and have been involved in Rootsweb <first donation '98> <I simply point out Rootsweb because of the resources that the USGenWeb and GAGenWeb uses on it and NOT because it is the USGenWeb or GAGenWeb> and Online Genealogy than most CCs in GA. I know the issues. I am not some new green recruit as some want to call me. I may not be a founding person in GA or US, but I've had my licks and I've done my time. And I'm really upset that everyone in Leadership can keep calling me malcontent, newbie, not my own person and that they see no problem with such. That to me speaks volumes. > Why 'present' was included in 02-23 as a valid choice - I don't know > or remember if it was discussed but it seems to me to be a wasted > vote. Abstaining <or Present> is found in every Parliamentary Procedures. People have a right to note they are there for the vote, yet not cast for either side. Derek Nichols Echols County, Ga