In a message dated 6/21/03 3:17:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cristian@netonecom.net writes: << Are we doing page checks now? Is this something that started that I didn't know about? Must have missed that email from the SC. <grin> Jan >> Sorry, I don't care if the links don't work if no one else does. Gone again. Going to take my camera this time. Donna

I said nothing on that order. All I did was ask a simple question. I don't feel that's out of line. Page checks are good, if you recall, I suggested surfing the pages as is done in TX. I do believe in page compliance. I do not however believe that it should be done without a sanctioned committee to do it, or the SC and RC's. To check a person's site for noncompliance and broken links and then announce it to the list, is not a good idea. It causes embarrassment to those CC's. When its done, a private email should be sent to that person. IMHO, it scares people away if they are new, and I would hate to see that happen. We need all the volunteers we can get. I just believe in privacy instead of embarrassment. Constructive criticism and encouragement, goes a long way. Just my two cents worth. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: <MFLP@aol.com> > Sorry, I don't care if the links don't work if no one else does. > Gone again. Going to take my camera this time. > Donna