Maybe we should add the word State. "Membership in The GAGenWeb Project is granted to County Coordinators and/or State Special Project Coordinators." "Each County or State Special Project shall have no more than two (2) Coordinators. A person may be a Coordinator for no more than three (3) sites. " and under something (definitions?) spell out USGenWeb Archives is a National Special Project. I believe at this time, all the archives people are also CCs, but that could chamge. Donna In a message dated 3/23/05 11:51:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: << This subject has not been addressed by the Bylaws Committee, but here is my opinion: The GAGenWeb Project has no authority to regulate a anyone's participation in the Archives Project. A person's participation in the Archives would have no bearing on the number of sites he/she coordinates in the Georgia project. Bylaws Committee members, what do you think? Vivian At 11:36 AM 3/23/2005 -0500, you wrote: >In other words, these new bylaws we are discussing >"Each County or Special Project shall have no more than two (2) Coordinators. >A person may be a Coordinator for no more than three (3) sites. " >would or would NOT limit the archives to 2 people or count in the total of >sites? > >Donna > >In a message dated 3/23/05 10:38:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, >[email protected] writes: > ><< Donna, > > Structurally and "legally," the Archives is a USGenWeb Special Project. The > GAGenWeb Project has no special projects at this time. > > However, by virtue of the fact that the Archives is a part of USGenWeb, it > also is a part of GAGenWeb. I think we can all agree that we do a > tremendous service to researchers if we direct them to this valuable >resource. > > Vivian >> >>

Doesn't GAGenWeb indicate State? And USGenWeb indicate National? ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:09 PM Subject: Re: BIZ Re: [GAGEN] Bylaws Committee Update Maybe we should add the word State. "Membership in The GAGenWeb Project is granted to County Coordinators and/or State Special Project Coordinators." "Each County or State Special Project shall have no more than two (2) Coordinators. A person may be a Coordinator for no more than three (3) sites. " and under something (definitions?) spell out USGenWeb Archives is a National Special Project.

Good idea, Donna. The Special Projects wording was added to give GAGenWeb the flexibility to have Special Projects in the future, if the membership so chooses. Vivian At 12:09 PM 3/23/2005 -0500, you wrote: >Maybe we should add the word State. > >"Membership in The GAGenWeb Project is granted to County Coordinators and/or >State Special Project Coordinators." > >"Each County or State Special Project shall have no more than two (2) >Coordinators. A person may be a Coordinator for no more than three (3) >sites. " > >and under something (definitions?) spell out >USGenWeb Archives is a National Special Project. > >I believe at this time, all the archives people are also CCs, but that could >chamge. > >Donna > > >In a message dated 3/23/05 11:51:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, >[email protected] writes: > ><< This subject has not been addressed by the Bylaws Committee, but here is >my > opinion: > > The GAGenWeb Project has no authority to regulate a anyone's participation > in the Archives Project. A person's participation in the Archives would > have no bearing on the number of sites he/she coordinates in the Georgia > project. > > Bylaws Committee members, what do you think? > > Vivian > > At 11:36 AM 3/23/2005 -0500, you wrote: > >In other words, these new bylaws we are discussing > >"Each County or Special Project shall have no more than two (2) >Coordinators. > >A person may be a Coordinator for no more than three (3) sites. " > >would or would NOT limit the archives to 2 people or count in the total of > >sites? > > > >Donna > > > >In a message dated 3/23/05 10:38:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, > >[email protected] writes: > > > ><< Donna, > > > > Structurally and "legally," the Archives is a USGenWeb Special Project. >The > > GAGenWeb Project has no special projects at this time. > > > > However, by virtue of the fact that the Archives is a part of > USGenWeb, it > > also is a part of GAGenWeb. I think we can all agree that we do a > > tremendous service to researchers if we direct them to this valuable > >resource. > > > > Vivian >> >> > > >==== GAGEN Mailing List ==== >GAGenWeb By-Laws Committee Information Web Site: >http://www.rootsweb.com/~gacolqu2/bylaws/