This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D30ED5954CE09EE06007A55B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit One more and I'll quit. --------------D30ED5954CE09EE06007A55B Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from bl-14.rootsweb.com (bl-14.rootsweb.com [209.85.6.30]) by fh105.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15477 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 07:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from [email protected]) by bl-14.rootsweb.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA26206; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 04:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 04:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Sender: [email protected] Sat Jun 3 04:42:22 2000 Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: "Jean Payton" <[email protected]> Old-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Fullers Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 06:08:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Resent-Message-ID: <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Resent-From: [email protected] X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/1797 X-Loop: [email protected] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [email protected] I, too am related to the Fullers of the Mayflower and I don't see where that has anything to do with being on a separate list just because I am the 8th great granddaughter of Edward Fuller and that does not make me any better than any of the other Fuller Descendents that are on this list. I don't think I need to be on the separate list just because he is of the Mayflower. Whats to discuss any how about them being on the Mayflower. Records are records and that is what counts. I have documentation and that is all I care about. Jean ----- Original Message ----- From: "Torres Family" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:07 AM Subject: Fullers > I am the great grandaughter of a Fuller, so I am a Fuller.I don't know if he > is a Mayflower Fuller yet, but could care less. A Fuller is a Fuller, No > matter what boat he arrived on. But should I find out they were Mayflower > Fullers, I don't think I would go-to only where they - COULD talk. The > reason why part of the rest of the Fuller lists can not go to this site is > because they have not traced it. They are no less Fuller, and a lot no less > Mayflower Fuller's. I assure you. I attend the DAR , yes, I have all those > precious proofs - Not an easy task.I however want to go because I like > history ,and we have history lectures. I am no more important because I have > a revolutionary solider (which killed himself) than any one else. My > riend( who is an excellent genealogist ) came to late to this country and > even though a lot of her good friends are in the DAR, can not join. I found > the earlier list posting offensive. Perhaps it was an accident on the part > of the poster, but it came off quite rude.I am a very good genealogist and > so are a lot of the not proved Fullers. This line just has never been one I > have worked on that often. Lately I have really begun to search it out, but > there have been many other lines I can not pull myself away from. We need to > remember that there aer people like me, and others that are stuck ( some are > Good researchers)and new genealogists which are going to wonder if we are > all walking around with our noses in the air!!! > > --------------D30ED5954CE09EE06007A55B--