Judy, I have 3 blog posts on how I do this. http://ftmuser.blogspot.com/search/label/HistrocalPlaces Which illustrates what you posted. Thank you, Russ ___________________________ Mailto:rworthington@att.net ________________________________ From: Judy in Ocala via <ftm-tech@rootsweb.com> To: Desmond McDowell <desmond.mcdowell@rogers.com>; "ftm-tech@rootsweb.com" <ftm-tech@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [FTM-TECH] Place/Description FTM 2012 If you're using the street address as the description, a better way to approach it would be to include the street address in the location field. The resulting location can be resolved in the Place Name Authority, if you are using that. If you need instructions on how to do that, let us know. Judy in Ocala On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Desmond McDowell via <ftm-tech@rootsweb.com> wrote: Question to do with Individual facts E.g.: Individual Fact Date Place/ Description Census 31 March 1901 Dumfries, Dumfries-shire, Scotland; 62 High Street Would it not be better to have the Description come first or is there another reason why FTM would do it this way, please advise Thanks Desmond ********************************** List information page http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/FTM-TECH.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FTM-TECH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ********************************** List information page http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/FTM-TECH.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FTM-TECH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message