RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [FTM-TECH] FTM 16 v. 2014: The Great Debate
    2. I fully agree with Ole and Mary. It is sad that ancestry does not support v16.I hate v14 and the layout of it is not my cup of tea. I am a senior citizen and I for one do not like changes My problem with v16 can not be use with Apple computer. I have v14 on my apple computer, but I really don't like it. My two cents worth. I will stay with v 16 on my old computer. Enjoy your day. Connie P.S. Maybe if enough of us senior citizens complain enough, they will go back and support v16. ---- "Ole P. Bielefeldt via" <ftm-tech@rootsweb.com> wrote: Hi Mary, I fully agree, therefore I have stayed with v16. I have 2014 just to compare. Regards Ole 2015-02-21 9:18 GMT+01:00 Mary W. Ellis via <ftm-tech@rootsweb.com>: > Judy, I'm using 2014, but the custom report in v16 had the one in 2014 > beat in all aspects, I can use the one we have now but it is harder to > get what you want out of it. > Mary Ellis > > > On 2/20/2015 11:47 PM, Judy in Ocala via wrote: > > We are coming up on 8 years since v. 16 was completely reprogrammed to a > new database structure. In the beginning, we all felt that v. 2008 was > lacking many of the features that we loved in 16. > > > > Over the years many improvements and enhancements have been made to > succeeding versions and upgrades. As a result, version 2014 is a much more > stable, robust, and versatile program than 2008 was. > > > > But in spite of the many improvements, there is an bedrock of loyal > users of v. 16. One of the reasons often given for sticking with 16 is the > reports, but there hasn't been much discussion about why the reports in 16 > are better. > > > > So I'm asking those who are still using v. 16 to share their opinions. > And not just about reports, but if you think there are other ways in which > v. 16 is superior. > > > > Please give examples, and keep your comments constructive. > > > > Judy in Ocala > > ********************************** > > List information page > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/FTM-TECH.html > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FTM-TECH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > -- > If you don't know your family history, you are a leaf that doesn't know it > is part of a tree. ~ Michael Crichton ~ > Mary W. Ellis > http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~mwellis/ > http://www.rootsweb.com/~ncacgs/ > > ********************************** > List information page > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/FTM-TECH.html > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FTM-TECH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- Ole P. Bielefeldt www.familytreemaker.dk ********************************** List information page http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/FTM-TECH.html ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FTM-TECH-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- God bless America

    02/20/2015 09:45:35
    1. Re: [FTM-TECH] FTM 16 v. 2014: The Great Debate
    2. Nivard Ovington via
    3. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for that to happen ;-) Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) Connie P.S. Maybe if > enough of us senior citizens complain enough, they will go back and > support v16.

    02/21/2015 03:59:53