>Thanks for the tips. I'd thought of those possibilities, too, but >am still mystified! The only thing that seems to work is to delete >the birth fact altogether and re-enter both the data and, of course >citations, etc. Very time consuming, but afterward the "Family" view >looks right again. So far I've only found this in one family with 7 >of their 11 children, but I maintain several trees with thousands of >individuals, so I hope someone comes up with another solution before >I find any more of these strange screens! Thanks again. Janelle >Message: 5 >Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:23:48 -0700 >From: BJ <bhamilton3@cox.net> >Subject: Re: [FTM-TECH] FTM 2009: Birth dates missing from list of > Children in Family view >To: ftm-tech@rootsweb.com >Message-ID: <4EB1DF14.7020603@cox.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >The only thing I can think of is if you have two sets of children one >set has the dates the other doesn't. The second set is being >displayed. Look for duplicate individuals. Also look to see whether >there are multiple relationships for the parents. > >BJ > >On 11/2/2011 4:10 PM, Janelle Ozeran wrote: > > I'm still using 2009. Just today after reading through the recent > > "missing dates" discussion I notice that in the lower panel listing > > the children of a person highlighted in the pedigree in the "Family" > > view. I've gone into each individual record and deleted and > > re-entered the data, checked the fact properties, made sure the dates > > are "preferred", everything I can think of... but when I go back to > > the "Family" view the children are still listed but with no > > dates. Can anyone help with this? > > > > >------------------------------ > > > >End of FTM-TECH Digest, Vol 5, Issue 267 >****************************************