Hi Jon, I will answer one question at a time as I will have to take a look to see about what you are asking. As for the first question, It was 2 a.m. when I quit working on the DNA pages and didn't get the Tree finished for Group 6. It is there now and you may have to "Reload" the page to see it. http://small-stuff.com/FRENCH/DNA/results.htm Julia In a message dated 10/29/2006 12:17:50 PM Central Standard Time, ccreview@grics.net writes: Julia, I'm curious why DNA Test Group 6 is the only one with no documented ancestors.

Hi Julia, Sorry! I thought I was the only who worked that late. And, it (and more) is there now. Thank you. Guess I was just anxious when I saw your posting. Again, thank you for yours and David's efforts. We all appreciate them and hope they eventually will answer questions or point us in the correct direction(s). Jon On Oct 29, 2006, at 12:48 PM, JULIAFWOOD@aol.com wrote: > Hi Jon, I will answer one question at a time as I will have to take > a look to > see about what you are asking. As for the first question, It was 2 > a.m. when > I quit working on the DNA pages and didn't get the Tree finished > for Group 6. > It is there now and you may have to "Reload" the page to see it. > > http://small-stuff.com/FRENCH/DNA/results.htm > > Julia > > In a message dated 10/29/2006 12:17:50 PM Central Standard Time, > ccreview@grics.net writes: > Julia, > > I'm curious why DNA Test Group 6 is the only one with no documented > ancestors. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FRENCH- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >