I have corresponed with Hugh and we have got things right. It really is no concern of yours and you should not butt in when you are not asked. I do not need you telling me what to do. I really can not think of a reason for getting an e-mail from you in the first place. If I tell someone they are full of it that is my business not yours. ----- Original Message ----- From: <JULIAFWOOD@aol.com> To: <FRENCH-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:32 AM Subject: Re: [FRENCH-L] Re: Lafford (1753 NJ-1834 NC) > I don't believe that Hugh was "jumping on your case". He is a valuable > researcher to the FRENCH list, and has spent many years in this effort. It > is easy to misunderstand intent in email, especially when the statement or > question is quickly to the point. > > You did state that Joseph FRENCH was born in NJ and died there. That > indicates that he did not leave NJ. If you had no place of death, that > should have been stated or the date and place of death omitted. > > When erroneous data gets started, it is harder to stop it if you don't do it > immediately. To let it go by, without question is, in effect, agreeing with > it. > > If you decide to leave our group, we will not try to stop you, but it will be > your loss, not ours, as we "old timers" have lots of data to share, and Hugh > has helped many, including myself. > > Julia French Wood > Listowner > > > > In a message dated 05/23/2000 12:48:22 AM Central Daylight Time, > jlfrench@iname.com writes: > > << I did not introduce as fact that Joseph and Hannah Horn French did not go > to > SC. You are full of it. No where in my message did I say or reference > anything about Joseph and Hannah Horn French going or not going to SC. > > You need to read better before jumping on my case. >> >