I whole heartedly agree. While I can understand a priority being sites with active web-builders adding, changing, improving, I think once the restore requests die down, the remaining sites must be restored. Cecil -----Original Message----- Subject: [FreeHelp]Re: Thanks for Restoring Tom Pick's Website Susan wrote: This site http://sites.rootsweb.com/~pick/ is the perfect example of the value of restoring all sites even if no one claims them for editing. All the links (including in Ancestry databases) would work again, and the effort that went into the sites would continue to be appreciated and used. --- Well said! I firmly believe all sites should be restored. Period. IF not for RW's ancient coding, the "security breach" would never have been a breach, and all the people who died believing their sites would live on would not now have their sites potentially "killed". If RW won't restore everyone's, what will happen to ours when we die? Why am I doing all this work if it'll all just get dumped? Judy ------------------------------ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com