Perhaps I should try to clarify why I'm so confused. In a website, The Main URL is like a "Main Topic". But Each Folder under it are all on the same "level", e.g. "level 2". All sub-folders would be "level 3". Is that how I should look at unordered lists? so Each Folder would be marked as <...ul class="Level2"><!--Level2 --> But I keep thinking of regular Outlines, like for a school term paper. Major Topic (Level 1) can have different "points" under it. So for example, 3 points. (That would be Levels 2, 3, 4) That would mean: <...ul class="Level2"><!--Level2 --> <...ul class="Level3"><!--Level3 --> <...ul class="Level4"><!--Level4 --> Each Point could have sub-points. In Outline form (a), (b), (c) or (i), (ii), (iii). But the sub-points are all the same "level". That would be ??? something like: <...ul class="Levela"><!--Levela --> ??? So do I think of unordered list with many nested lists just like a Term Paper "outline"? So Each Folder is like Point 1, Point 2, Point 3, etc. And each sub-folder as a group of sub-points under their Folder or "Point"? I know my learning styles confuse people here, when you're used to just focusing on what tag goes where. But my style means I have to use an organized Commenting Structure, BEFORE I truly understand where the tags go. Do I think of it as an Outline? Won't numerous numbers on the "Points" make the CSS classes harder to group together? Judy

Level one will always be your home/index page. Pages linked from there are level two. Pages linked from level 2 pages are level three. And so forth. Now, you can "comment" each page with a synopsis of its content. 1. Level one. 2.Level two/one a. comments on what are in level two/one. 3. Level three/one. a. comments on level three/one. 3. Level three/two 4. Level four/one 3. Level three/two 2. Level two/two 2. level two/three Think of it as a family tree. You start with the first [ furtherest back ] parents with each generation under it. On 08/22/2015 05:40 PM, JFlorian via wrote: > Perhaps I should try to clarify why I'm so confused. > > In a website, The Main URL is like a "Main Topic". > But Each Folder under it are all on the same "level", e.g. "level 2". > All sub-folders would be "level 3". > Is that how I should look at unordered lists? so Each Folder would be > marked as > <...ul class="Level2"><!--Level2 --> > > > But I keep thinking of regular Outlines, like for a school term paper. > Major Topic (Level 1) can have different "points" under it. So for > example, 3 points. (That would be Levels 2, 3, 4) > That would mean: > <...ul class="Level2"><!--Level2 --> > <...ul class="Level3"><!--Level3 --> > <...ul class="Level4"><!--Level4 --> > Each Point could have sub-points. In Outline form (a), (b), (c) or (i), > (ii), (iii). But the sub-points are all the same "level". > That would be ??? something like: > <...ul class="Levela"><!--Levela --> > ??? > > > So do I think of unordered list with many nested lists just like a Term > Paper "outline"? So Each Folder is like Point 1, Point 2, Point 3, etc. > And each sub-folder as a group of sub-points under their Folder or "Point"? > > I know my learning styles confuse people here, when you're used to just > focusing on what tag goes where. > But my style means I have to use an organized Commenting Structure, BEFORE > I truly understand where the tags go. > > Do I think of it as an Outline? Won't numerous numbers on the "Points" > make the CSS classes harder to group together? > > Judy > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- "Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice. Pull down your pants and slide on the ice." Sydney Friedmann ( MASH 4077 ) _ _... ..._ _ _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._