On 02/28/11 14:30, lrlaskey wrote: Billie and all, I must apologize for this message being sent. As you can tell, it was never finished. Please ignore it. Lorrie > Billie, > > Voicing opinions is healthy and good for everyone. Sometimes > something learned and everyone's voice is heard. My opinion is just > that, mine. It just so happen that you chose a subject that as you > stated in an earlier message, "I have been working on learning more > about CSS/style elements when I have some spare time." > > On 02/28/11 12:10, Billie Walsh wrote: >> All right. I stand defeated. I don't know if I will unsubscribe, but I >> will hence forth and forever refrain from posting anything to the list. >> It appears that alternate views are not welcome. >> >> On 02/28/2011 11:57 AM, lrlaskey wrote: >>> Billie, >>> >>> I have to speak to this. I know I am preaching to the choir for some >>> listers but for those not using or understanding style sheets, comparing >>> a few characters of html styles in a line of html code to that of a >>> style sheet is like comparing apples to oranges. >>> >>> There is no comparison when one considers the savings in time, file >>> size, errors, site control, download time, ability to include other >>> styles based on whether mobile, desktop, print and so on and so on. It >>> must be experienced to be understood. >>> >>> And, the flexibililty will continue to improve in the future as hand >>> held devices and their use increases. This is especially true in lesser >>> developed countries where desk top computer use is low but hand held is >>> increasing. >>> >>> They are two different things. Each has it's place but the style sheet >>> is superior unless a website is relying entirely on browser styles. I >>> cannot recommend enough that anyone who has a website should learn a >>> minimun of css to at least understand how read and find styles. >>> Technology is improving and will pass webmasters by unless they stay on >>> top. >>> >>> Lorrie >>> >>> On 02/28/11 10:58, Billie Walsh wrote: >>>> This is getting blown all out of proportion. >>>> >>>> I'm not saying that style elements and CSS shouldn't be used. >>>> >>>> I have a video series on CSS and Style elements that I picked up. And I >>>> have been working on learning more about CSS/style elements when I have >>>> some spare time. I have incorporated some style elements into some of my >>>> pages to do things you just can't do with standard HTML tags. The web >>>> page editor that I use has a built in style/CSS editor but you have to >>>> know more about how it works to use it. >>>> >>>> All I'm saying is that for some things there is a simple HTML way to do it. >>>> >>> On 02/28/11 10:58, Billie Walsh wrote: >>>> This is getting blown all out of proportion. >>>> >>>> I'm not saying that style elements and CSS shouldn't be used. >>>> >>>> I have a video series on CSS and Style elements that I picked up. And I >>>> have been working on learning more about CSS/style elements when I have >>>> some spare time. I have incorporated some style elements into some of my >>>> pages to do things you just can't do with standard HTML tags. The web >>>> page editor that I use has a built in style/CSS editor but you have to >>>> know more about how it works to use it. >>>> >>>> All I'm saying is that for some things there is a simple HTML way to do it. >>>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email toFREEPAGES-HELP-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>